Mk2 Lander Can, classic or unfinished?

[NomenNescio]

Seriously, am I the only one who thinks this capsules interior could use a serious upgrade? I mean alright I get it, some of the capsules are just minimalistic. The Mk1-2 Command Pod is, as is the Mk1 Command Pod. However with both of those you're crammed into a small space and there were never gonna be a lot to see under any circumstances, but the Mk2 Lander Can is spacious, there's room to step back and enjoy the models and textures and what do we get? Bare minimum. I understand that doing IVA's isn't something the devs are eager to do, but surely I'm not the only one who has thought like this? Especially after the introduction of the Mk1 Lander Can, the Mk2 really really really just pales in comparison.

[waterlubber]

Indeed. Not to mention it's heaviness. We need a mini 1.5m hitchiker and a half sized (half as tall) 2.5m one

[problemecium]

I still await the day the "IVA" feature involves intra-vehicular... activities. Such as:

- Clicking the hatch at the top & bottom of the Hitchhiker container, or the back of the Mk1-2 Pod, etc. to move to the next crew cabin

- Changing seats

- Doing experiments within the Mobile Lab; perhaps a simple minigame that rewards Science points.

It'd give us something to do in the lander cans besides look out the window.

If I were to complain about the lander can, it'd be about the outside, i.e. the fact that the can is too fat to fit inside a Mk2 cargo bay.

Edited May 27, 2015 by parameciumkid

[Sky_walker]

IMHO the goal should be to match the quality of Mk II cockpit. It's really, really beautiful and I wish all of the IVAs would be up to the same standard.

I still await the day the "IVA" feature involves intra-vehicular... activities.

Oh yes, yes please. They should talk with the RasterPropMonitor guys and try to make it stock, or something...