Jump to content

[1.6.1] Chaka Monkey 161


YANFRET

Recommended Posts

Oh no, our license agreement with KW specifies no conflict interaction, the parts get new CFG's with bespoke names.

I think we should scale these up even more... the performance needs to justify the solid option. This idea came about in the first place as a way to send 3.75m launchable modules to orbits above Mun ... so far we're not getting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Monkey Transfer Vehicle

Version 7

 

• Expanded habitat size

• Inverse launch configuration

• Landing craft now sold separately ( Duna Orbit Rendezvous )

• Reduced parts count

• Upper stage can be used to modify orbit after docking with drive section!

• Fixed right click issue with Chaka habitats causing failure to dock / undock ( reduced module count )

 

 

kwVF2K.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Table said:

Progress with 1.1 update?

 

A lot of little ( yet deal breaking ) bugs have been squashed. Still working a few issues with docking / undocking, and a few vendors are still working on new models. Soon esque? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Great work so far, thumbs up!

But I think you should tidy up your installation folder a little.  For a lot of "part.cfg" files there exists "part - Copy - Copy.cfg" and "part - Copy (2).cfg" and "part - Copy (2) - Copy.cfg". KSP loads all of them and this is probably not want you want. And in CMES->Structural->SLS_CM is and old zip files for fairing which probably does not belong there..??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great work so far, thumbs up!

But I think you should tidy up your installation folder a little.  For a lot of "part.cfg" files there exists "part - Copy - Copy.cfg" and "part - Copy (2).cfg" and "part - Copy (2) - Copy.cfg". KSP loads all of them and this is probably not want you want. And in CMES->Structural->SLS_CM is and old zip files for fairing which probably does not belong there..??

<Edit:>
I have to correct myself. It looks that the different config files indeed belong to different parts, althouth their file name suggests that this is the same config file existing multiple times... :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...