What parts do you feel need an art pass/redone model?

[Wjolcz]

The new 1.25 inline cockpit. I feel it's horrible, looks more like an insect eye. I won't use it.

And I don't like the black borders of the wing parts.

IMO Mk1 inline cockpit looks pretty good compared to the standard, pointy one. I know it would be ridiculous reentry-wise but would like to see it redone B-29 or Arado 234 style.

Edited June 21, 2015 by Veeltch

[Aanker]

IMO Mk1 inline cockpit looks pretty good compared to the standard, pointy one. I know it would be ridiculous reentry-wise but would like to see it redone B-29 or Arado 234 style.

I suppose making it look more 'Spaceship Two' like could be a solution. You still get the effect of the multiple glass panels, without everything being glass panels.

[Wjolcz]

I suppose making it look more 'Spaceship Two' like could be a solution. You still get the effect of the multiple glass panels, without everything being glass panels.

You mean SpaceShipOne? The multiple round hole-like windows?

I would like that one a lot too.

Edited July 3, 2015 by Veeltch

[Kagame]

The Mk. 2 inline cockpit is unbearably hideous. I have never, ever used it in a Mk. 2 form factor SSTO- I've always had to clip it into a 2.5m tank or something. And if the LVT-45 could get a small buff and its own little "mini Merlin" model, that would be awesome.

[Kuansenhama]

The 2.5M fuel tanks look too old/industrial with the rivets and rust. They don't fit with the Kerbodyne parts or the 1.25M parts all that well. I think the jet engines could use a little modernizing too.

Oh yeah, and the MK3 cockpit description still says 'IVA in shipping and customs' when it's done.

Edited July 3, 2015 by Kuansenhama

[DaMichel]

Yes, the 2.5 m fuel tanks!

[Wjolcz]

I look more and more at the suggestions in this thread and start to think almost all rocket parts need refreshing. The rings on fuel tanks really bother me for some reason. They make them look less aerodynamic. I agree with those who say that the style really needs to be unified.

EDIT: Have I mentioned my hate for ugliness of 3-man capsule?

Edited July 3, 2015 by Veeltch

[windows_x_seven]

The 2.5m decoupler. Jebus, it's large as heck.

[Kuansenhama]

^Yeah the 2.5M decoupler is a bit ridiculous. I don't think the 3-man pod is all that ugly though...

I forgot to mention before. I'd like better particles and sound effects on the Ant and Spider engines, as well as the mono-propellant engine.

Edited July 3, 2015 by Kuansenhama

[Mad Rocket Scientist]

The black bars on the 3.75m parts don't even line up! Plus, it's so fuzzy! Looks like the tanks have a beard!

[micr0wave]

The big reaction wheels looks a bit unfinished and is often the weakest link.