Jump to content

The problem with the atomic engine now is bulk


RocketBlam

Recommended Posts

I'm agreeable to editable tanks, and also agreeable to procedural tanks. But I'm also agreeable to just having a 2.5m part that is fully LF.

I mean, they have smaller parts that are LF, and big spaceplane parts... it doesn't seem to be out of the ordinary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The argument (shared by Scott Manley) that "LF+O tanks are fair for LV-Ns because of reduced propellant density" breaks down as soon as you notice that LF only tanks exist. Either tank fuel types should be tweakable (or, as a weaker option, add more LF only tanks) or the aircraft fuel tanks should be removed for 'balance' reasons (and what a wreck that would be for airbreathers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The beauty of LEGO is, that a little 2x1 block can be part of a brick wall in one build, but an engine nacelle for a plane in another build. Tweakable contents of fuel tanks would accomplish that same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...