procedural motor parts

[m3m3lja]

I played KSP today like everyday, then I thought "it's so hard to build multi-purposal rover, but if I have motor or something it will way better than now".

So what if squad adds motor to KSP? Don't you think it's good and cool?

So, what I and some of my friends want is the motor. This is the full list of the motors I want.

-stack motor in various radii (radius)

-stack servo-motor in various radii

-radial motor in various sizes

-radial servo-motor in various sizes

-pistons,springs in various sizes

[Windspren]

So you're trying to turn it into Kerbal Car Program? We already have rover wheels, we don't need every part in a combustion engine.

[m3m3lja]

oh really? we have wheels so don't need motors? I didn't say about that motor.if you know what servo motor is, you would not say like that.

[Red Iron Crown]

I'm not 100% clear what you mean either, and in fairness you did mention a rover in your first post. Do you mean to make moving parts other than wheels, like hinges and such?

[Kaos]

I would indeed like more mechanical parts to be included. Not mainly for rovers, but for example for ground base construction. Then one could adapt the height of a docking port. This works at the moment a bit with the claw, as it can be used as flexible joint, but the claw is kraken bait and inferior to active moving parts for this purpose.

[Windspren]

oh really? we have wheels so don't need motors? I didn't say about that motor.if you know what servo motor is, you would not say like that.

Well, you did mention pistons and springs, and those are parts in combustion engines. Combustion engines would not make a very good part for KSP. Hint: Combustion engines need oxygen. There's no oxygen anywhere but Kerbin and Laythe