Jump to content

The Age Of Robots has come!


*Aqua*

Recommended Posts

Mech is probably a better term, but FFS, FASA probably has a copyright on the word.

But... yeah. A vehicle that has legs instead of wheels. That still makes it really freaking cool though, no matter what you call it.

Isn't mech a shortened version of mecha as well?

I'm pretty sure FASA might have copyright over "Battlemech."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't mech a shortened version of mecha as well?

Afaik in the western hemisphere a mechanic/mechatronic suit is usually called "mech" because of the huge success of BattleMech. A mech can have any shape from tank-alike to humanoid. They are designed for either combat or construction work and (usually) aren't faster as tanks.

On the other hand in Japan such suits are commonly called mecha and are usually of humanoid shape. Sometimes they can transform into a plane shape and/or dock with other mechas to create a bigger mecha. Usually mechas have some sort of unrealistic high power supply, beam weapons, sabers, hand-like actuators to grab something and incredible high agility & acceleration.

TL;DR mechas are mechs on steroids.

That's how I perceive them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the battle would be done excludes such options.

That's why I'd like to see actual robots, not mechas, so they could use really nasty stuff. :)

But they're talking about wanting melee capabilities. I know there's plenty that can be done to make the cockpits secure, but it's still going to be pretty darned dangerous. Like a demolition derby using monster trucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and it's really stretching to call your car a robot.

It is not, which was exactly my point. We are surrounded by robots in our daily lives, though they are often hard to recognize. On the other hand, the things we typically view as robots (in assembly lines, for instance), are often much more passive than we imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not, which was exactly my point. We are surrounded by robots in our daily lives, though they are often hard to recognize. On the other hand, the things we typically view as robots (in assembly lines, for instance), are often much more passive than we imagine.

Same goes for just about any sci-fi definition of high-tech.

I know for instance, that smart phones are among the most advanced pieces of tech that are available to consumers. But they're also designed to NOT feel like computers.

For me, THIS

vintagecomputerstopsection.png

...still feels high-tech. Even though all of that could fit into...

Tesla_AppleWatch_ELEKSlabs_63.png

...which really doesn't feel like much of anything to me. It's a kind of aesthetic, which I'm sure also affects my perception of what a "robot" is in my mind, just not in the literal technical sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...