MetaCritic score!

[RAINCRAFTER]

(If this needs to be moved, please do so.)

So, good news everybody! We are one of the highest rated games on MetaCritic!

Our critic score is 88/100 and our user score is 8.8/10.

[Randazzo]

I'm glad that KSP is high up on the list.

Here's an interesting review:

"A perfect blend of science and slapstick, and a robust and compelling sandbox of possibility. Simply outstanding. But the steam cards are very disappointing and lacking." Rating: 0

Steam cards in 1.2.

[Alshain]

Ah Metacritic. Quite possibly the worst source of game information to exist on the web today.

[RAINCRAFTER]

Ah Metacritic. Quite possibly the worst source of game information to exist on the web today.

Yeah, that's true. The only reason I rejoiced is because this means more hype!

[PsychSpec]

Actually, I find that while user reviews are bad because they tend to be binary (either 0 or 10 pretty much), professional critics' reviews average out to be something I can somewhat trust. Obviously, scores are a simplification and aren't the only thing I personally look at, but they aren't a bad indicator of a game's quality.

In regards to KSP, a 8.8 average seems right on the money.

[klgraham1013]

Apparently, I'm a harsh critic.

[KSK]

A fine example of why either Internet customer ratings or numerical ratings (you choose) are usually not worth the time it takes to read them. "This game is great but because it omitted one small detail, I'll give it a zero." Because that clearly makes all kinds of sense.