Jump to content

Suborbit around the sun


Recommended Posts

I know this has been asked a few times, but the treads I found did no give a full answer.

- Which distance to the sun counts as being in suborbit?

- How to achieve the cheapest momentary suborbit which I can inverse immediately? So far, I only found a retrograde ejection from Kerbin at about 6,000m/s deltaV.

- I can do those 6000m/s with a LV-N, if I can time the long burn times correctly. But how? I noted that if I burn >6 minutes, the whole orbit shifts while I accelerate and the deltaV prediction from the maneuver node is not necessarily accurate anymore.

Edited by Falkenherz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Distance is irrelevant. The trajectory just has to intercept the sun's surface.

Retrograde ejection from Kerbin is correct. Delta-V looks about right.

For low TWR rockets and long burns, I like to chain a few short burns. So make a node, get it to the point where it will be a short enough burn (< 1 minute), then make another node a bit further on the new orbit, etc. If you do it right you'll get a reasonable projection of where the single long burn will send you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

600km is the altitude you need your periapsis to dip below to count as suborbital.

Yes, I said that. The distance your craft gets to is irrelevant. The altitude of perihelion is what matters. That has to intersect the "surface" of the sun's atmosphere, which is at 600km. This works for any other body: the periapsis of the orbit must intersect the surface of the atmosphere to be considered a suborbital trajectory, or the surface of the body if it has no atmosphere. Clearer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I said that. The distance your craft gets to is irrelevant. The altitude of perihelion is what matters. That has to intersect the "surface" of the sun's atmosphere, which is at 600km. This works for any other body: the periapsis of the orbit must intersect the surface of the atmosphere to be considered a suborbital trajectory, or the surface of the body if it has no atmosphere. Clearer?

Yes, and just like any other body the altitude is relevant, or rather distance from the surface. Not sure why you chose to shoot down the OPs question in such a way as to call it "irrelevant" when he asked a very simple and straightforward question. Clearer? I was glad to followup and address his question with the specific altitude. Not sure what this reply hoped to add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...