Jump to content

The Criteria for a Space Plane


Recommended Posts

I built an Aircraft and it can get to an Altitude of 43,000 but not able to achieve orbit, my question, would this still be considered a Space Plane?

Edited by castille7
Question Answered
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Real World, there is no clear and precise end to Earth's atmosphere, so the definition for "space" is what everybody agrees on - generally the Kármán line.

In KSP, there is a clear and precise end to Kerbin's atmoshere, namely 70 kilometres altitude, where the physics engine stops applying atmospheric effects.

So, as far as I'm concerned, in order for it to be a "space" plane, it needs to reach space, and thus needs to be able to achieve an apoapsis of at least 70 km. Note that that's not "orbit", which would make the craft much more useful in a working space program, and is probably what people think of when they first think "space plane".

Edited by DeMatt
New forum formatting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Real World, there is no clear and precise end to Earth's atmosphere, so the definition for "space" is what everybody agrees on - generally the Kármán line.

In KSP, there is a clear and precise end to Kerbin's atmoshere, namely 70 kilometres altitude, where the physics engine stops applying atmospheric effects.

So, as far as I'm concerned, in order for it to be a "space" plane, it needs to reach space, and thus needs to be able to achieve an apoapsis of at least 70 km. Note that that's not "orbit", which would make the craft much more useful in a working space program, and is probably what people think of when they first think "space plane".

Wonderful! thank you, I will keep working on it, these space planes are very challenging for sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, getting to space with a plane isn't too hard - it can be done with minimal tech too. What generally considered challenging are SSTO planes (as in 'single stage to orbit'). Taking a considerable payload too is indeed pretty hard (and enjoyable), so as landing back on the KSC runway. The K-Prize is one of the most popular challenges.

Also, if you make a half-working SSTO and ask for help here, expect at least two pages of replies. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, getting to space with a plane isn't too hard - it can be done with minimal tech too. What generally considered challenging are SSTO planes (as in 'single stage to orbit'). Taking a considerable payload too is indeed pretty hard (and enjoyable), so as landing back on the KSC runway. The K-Prize is one of the most popular challenges.

Also, if you make a half-working SSTO and ask for help here, expect at least two pages of replies. :)

When I said Space Plane that is what I had in mind an SSTO with stock only parts, thanks for the information and I will look into the K Prize, I love a good challenge, that's why I can't stop playing KSP!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...