Jump to content

Heat rejection: Atmospheric vs vacuum?


Recommended Posts

I'm trying to do a practice burn of my new NTR-based propulsion section for a deep-space vessel I'm working on, but I'm not sure if it's giving accurate results. Primarily, does the atmosphere impact engine heat buildup in any way (such as convection, or reducing the thrust)?

Edited by MaverickSawyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, a couple of suborbital test flights with the engines in question have revealed that yes, there is a DRAMATIC difference in heat buildup. The atmospheric tests are highly misleading, as there seems to be some sort of convective heat loss off the engines. So, test your engines/engine units (if you're docking it to the ship) on a suborbital flight, with a minimum ignition point for the engines somewhere above 25km altitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...