Jump to content

Quick aero question


Recommended Posts

It will likely add more drag than just the docking port above it. If you want to put a nose cone on top, you're better off with one that's roughly the same size as the part below it. So in this case, something that matches up to the docking port / science module, rather than the large nose cone.

Also, the lander's fuel tank will cause quite a bit of drag since there's nothing tapering up to it. Same for the hitchhiker. If you can make smooth transitions, or just one abrupt transition, that's better than stepping back and forth between sizes.

Cheers,

~Claw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record, this turned out to be the best option, after trying all available cones. I am working on a lander design that will keep the wide base, while trying to solve the problems pointed out by the Claw.

screenshot38.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...