Jump to content

Contract refusing to complete (maybe a bug?)


Recommended Posts

I've never been to Eve myself, but if I follow kerbin's example, the science reports always says "... taken on Kerbin surface" Or "... taken in Kerbin water" or something like that. If that's the case, I do think that Gaarst is right in thinking the water isn't considered the surface.

Edited by aidyn89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm having the same problem with a contract to return ore from Minmus, it says every condition has been met except the "Land your Ore on Kerbin" one. Like the above issue my craft is bobbing in the ocean, but the contract won't complete, KSP simply isn't recognizing a craft in the ocean as being landed on that body.

KSP%20Contract%20bug%20not%20landed.jpg?dl=0

Edited by Finox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water is not land.

So? I "landed" on the water, just like a seaplane lands on the water, we don't say that they splashdown. :sticktongue:

Seriously though, if the ore was returned to Kerbin where it can be recovered, then who cares if its on physical land or not? If a space agency does a sample return they don't care if the return vehicle is picked up by a boat or a truck they still have their sample. I figured the point of such a mission was as a test of your ability to collect and retrieve 12 tons of ore from another body, not to see if you could hit land. This is WAD then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the OP, this should satisfy the contract. Nitpicking whether it is land or water liquid is not in the spirit of the contract. It wants you to be on the surface and the water liquid has a surface.

This issue has popped up in the past, and I'd rather keep the splashdown objective and the landing objective separate on planets with oceans. So to address the issue, I have reworded the contract to "make ground contact" to alleviate any confusion.

Edited by Arsonide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This issue has popped up in the past, and I'd rather keep the splashdown objective and the landing objective separate on planets with oceans. So to address the issue, I have reworded the contract to "make ground contact" to alleviate any confusion.

Is it perhaps possible to clarify the "land on land" objective a bit more? The english language is a bit confusing to me (but apparently I'm not alone), I was pretty sure that "to land" meant just getting down safely on the surface. After all, even seaplanes "land" on water, don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it perhaps possible to clarify the "land on land" objective a bit more? The english language is a bit confusing to me (but apparently I'm not alone), I was pretty sure that "to land" meant just getting down safely on the surface. After all, even seaplanes "land" on water, don't they?

It no longer uses the word "land" at any point. It says to make ground contact with the planet, which is about as specific as it can get I'm afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...