Jump to content

Joint plan to visit an asteroid


PB666

Recommended Posts

You just got to love how NASA gets the simpler part of the mission.

It's an accounting thing; NASA mission cost caps don't include the LV but do include instruments, so they get the high-energy vehicle with minimum instrumentation, whereas ESA cost caps don't include instruments (which are supplied separately by member states) so they get the heavily-instrumented orbiter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an accounting thing; NASA mission cost caps don't include the LV but do include instruments, so they get the high-energy vehicle with minimum instrumentation, whereas ESA cost caps don't include instruments (which are supplied separately by member states) so they get the heavily-instrumented orbiter.

That didn't matter anyways, as DART is launching on the smaller Minotaur V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, ESA did get some useful infos on how to pull off this kind of mission from the rosetta mission. (Afterall, the lander will have some of the same jobs philae had - CONSERT like tandem instruments, etc.

And now that ESA knows roughly what didn't work on philae's landing systems (notably the harpoon nitrocellulose charges), they'll be able to refine their landers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...