[WIP] Unrealism Overhaul

[Guest]

So I haven't worked on anything yet, but I'm going to throw together the polar opposite of realism overhaul using Toy Solar System. I'm going to rescale the stock parts with Module Manager to make it fit, and I'll see about changing the contracts to make them a bit...smaller. (instead of putting something in a 100,000m orbit, you'd put something into, say, a 10,000m orbit.)

[zekes]

... I'm going to throw together the polar opposite of realism overhaul...

Poles are anywhere along the equator

3 triangles per part

Gravity is 10000 m/s up

Everyhing part clips

Fuel lines refil tanks

Grass is blue

Water is lava

jet engines require kerbal sacrifices to run

The cake is real

KSC is actually a duck and is on the mun.

RCS thrusters are FTL drives

Good start?

Edited November 13, 2015 by zekes

[problemecium]

Wait, some of those you listed are true in stock... ;P

[Guest]

Wait, some of those you listed are true in stock... ;P

I mean making everything smaller, as in rescaling to 1/10 of stock scale.

[PCanas]

I mean making everything smaller, as in rescaling to 1/10 of stock scale.

What does it change? If you rescale everything to 1/10 of the scale, won't you end up with exactly the same thing?

[Guest]

What does it change? If you rescale everything to 1/10 of the scale, won't you end up with exactly the same thing?

Well, I might not scale EVERYTHING.

[EladDv]

Poles are anywhere along the equator

Everyhing part clips

Water is lava

jet engines require kerbal sacrifices to run

RCS thrusters are FTL drives

Good start?

i mean that half is already true in stock KSP

[lextacy]

@PART

[*]

{

@MODULE

[*]

{

@

[*] /= 10

}

}

Thesource code for unrealism overhaul

[Autochton]

TSS lends itself to bonkers things like moderately fast jetplanes going into suborbital space hops, potentially to the Mün. So that sounds fun!

Massively upscaling masses (tank dry masses, engines, etc.) would also be a meaningful 'opposite-land' change - KSP's stock stuff is grossly too heavy compared to real world equivalents. Maybe a denser, more draggy atmosphere near the surface or Kerbin - the return of the souposphere?

Of course, I think the focus should be on building small, nutty rocket-scooters to gad about the solar system.

[Whirligig Girl]

I wouldn't rescale all the parts, I would redo the fuel tank masses and engine Isp to be more massive and less efficient repsectively. Crappy steampunk tech, basically. I have been limiting my private TSS game (not The Kerbal Wilds) to using only Sepatrons and O-10 Monoprop engines and RCS thrusters.

[Guest]

[quote name='GregroxMun']I wouldn't rescale all the parts, I would redo the fuel tank masses and engine Isp to be more massive and less efficient repsectively. Crappy steampunk tech, basically. I have been limiting my private TSS game (not The Kerbal Wilds) to using only Sepatrons and O-10 Monoprop engines and RCS thrusters.[/QUOTE]
Smart. I will likely do that.

[Guest]

[quote name='Autochton']TSS lends itself to bonkers things like moderately fast jetplanes going into suborbital space hops, potentially to the Mün. So that sounds fun!

Massively upscaling masses (tank dry masses, engines, etc.) would also be a meaningful 'opposite-land' change - KSP's stock stuff is grossly too heavy compared to real world equivalents. Maybe a denser, more draggy atmosphere near the surface or Kerbin - the return of the souposphere?

Of course, I think the focus should be on building small, nutty rocket-scooters to gad about the solar system. :P[/QUOTE]
After a test of reentry, I'm likely going to change the atmosphere density.