Jump to content

Blue horizons launched and landed their New Shepard rocket after suborbital flight yesterday


Cirocco

Recommended Posts

[url]http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34909713[/url]

interesting little article. Short version: Jeff Bezos (creator and CEO of Amazon.com) has started a company called Blue horizons which is aimed towards space tourism. Yesterday they launched a full-sized test vehicle, made a suborbital hop and brought the (empty) capsule as well as the rocket back down. The capsule lands on parachutes, the rocket uses powered descent (though not a suicide burn like SpaceX does).

Note: while there may seem to be a big similarity to SpaceX's attempts at powered landing att first, the two scenario's are completely different. SpaceX has to haul far larger payloads, far larger rockets, aims for orbit, can't have their rockets hover because of the extremely powerful merlin engine, etc.

Still, it's nice to see technology evolving on multiple fronts :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[video=youtube;9pillaOxGCo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pillaOxGCo[/video]

Video, wow this is amazing. I know it's not hardcore launch stuff into outer space, but it's a giant step for rockets science and rocket economics. Being able to return and redeploy all parts of the rocket is amazing!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='GregroxMun']Wow! Stick another engine on it, extend the stack a bit, and add a second stage and you may very well have yourself a reusable launch vehicle![/QUOTE]
Blue do want to extend the same technology to an orbital vehicle, but from what little we've seen of it it seems to be considerably larger than this booster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[I]That. is. sick.[/I]

Mechjeb doing those last second burns always freaks me out, but it's a lot more impressive watching Mechblue do it with a real piece of hardware.

However, I'm not sure I'd want to ride in that pod, considering how hard the touchdown appeared to be. Edited by Randazzo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Kanukki']What's the main advantage to powered landing, vs parachutes for recovering the launch vehicle? I'm guessing being able to precisely pick the landing spot?[/QUOTE]

Less weight. The parachutes to gently land a rocket stage would have to be huge. The Shuttle SRB parachutes were the largest ever made and weighed nearly 5 tons with their deployment systems. Yet, the boosters still splashed down at 23 m/s (80 km/h) in the ocean and were often dented and buckled.

To land on the ground, you would need much larger chutes, and to add some sort of dampening system such as airbags or Soyuz-like landing motors, which would also increase the weight.

In the end, it's easier to just carry some more propellant for the landing and use the same propulsion system.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...