Jump to content

Gas Giants in KSP.


Talisman

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one that wants to make an aerostatic habitat in order to mine helium-3, instead of blowing it up? Once interstellar missions are possible, we\'re going to need some source of fuel.

You can just say, 'Cloud City.' It\'s what everyone\'s thinking. And no, you\'re not the only one. If I could, I would relocate my entire operation to a planet like Saturn or at least one of its muns. Plentiful fuel plus lots of hydrocarbons and water ice (if we\'re talking Titan) and Helium-3 from the gas giant.. Sounds too good to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gas giants could be very challenging, because they had in general a lot of moons (even planet-sized) and asteroids. For example, Jupiter had 66 moons and 4 of them are larger than our moon, rest is more like ksp minmus or smaller :P

Same planet itself is less interesting - u can\'t land on it and it\'s a death-trap for everyone who enter too close 8).

Below, planet\'s and largest moons comparison from planetary society web-page :) (large).

scale-solar-system-for-23x35-poster-labeled.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can just say, 'Cloud City.' It\'s what everyone\'s thinking. And no, you\'re not the only one. If I could, I would relocate my entire operation to a planet like Saturn or at least one of its muns. Plentiful fuel plus lots of hydrocarbons and water ice (if we\'re talking Titan) and Helium-3 from the gas giant.. Sounds too good to be true.

Remember, this is the universe we\'re talking about. It stopped making sense 14.6 billion years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap, is the real difference between Earth and Jupiter really so big? We are really nothing down here...

Not only that - but something like 98% of a proton is empty space - the matter we\'re all made of is only a tiny chunk of what may or may not be here. So we\'re really nothing down here AND really nothing down here ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, no. According to quantum theory, the universe can create/destroy these virtual particles at 'will', so long as it repays the energy needed. That\'s why they only last on the Planck scale (read: scale of measurement too small to measure or quantify). Also, it can\'t create these particles if they\'re being observed. The universe is just weird like that.

…In other words, quantum physics play by the rules of politics. Who knew?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who\'s got the Universe\'s audit where it says it paid back all the energy though? It\'s handy to think that it all evens out in the end, but whenever is this case in life?

Proper question though - doesn\'t that suppose that virtual particles don\'t exist 'outside' the universe (where we\'re obvious doing the least observing)? I\'ve honestly not kept up with quantum physics... I wish I learned how interesting physics, chemistry and biology were in school but damn they make you hate it.

What about the question of the quantum watched pot? Is it boiled? Why did it boil? ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. It sure would be nice if it all evened out, possibly through heat emissions, but that makes too much sense.

Edit: Funny how this thread went from a suggestion, to uses of gas giants, to the size of Jupiter, and finally to quantum physics. The universe really is nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all starts to make a bizarre sort of sense once you get a somewhat firm grasp on mass-energy equivalency. The important part is not pretending to know the bits of QM that don\'t make sense to you.

I\'ve heard physics professors say that anyone who thinks they have a real good idea of how quantum theory works doesn\'t really. Sort of how you might think a photon is a particle, but when you measure it it\'s a wave!! ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GeneralIssue, it\'s like that in every field - anyone who claims to be an 'expert' generally isn\'t as the more one finds out about something the more one realises one doesn\'t know.

Totally on-topic: If Squad are planning on an FTL system (seems sorta likely) - we will travel far and thus need lots to look at. How close we\'ll be able to get to gas planets is another question. Perhaps we\'ll get clouds first, then nebulae and THEN something with hardcore gravity like a gas giant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...