Non-copenhagen interpretation of non-locality

[PB666]

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160517-pilot-wave-theory-gains-experimental-support/

Interesting read. 

[Steel]

If I remember correctly there was a huge thread on this a while back where the (admittedly very spammy) OP got torn to shreds for arguing this interpretation 

[PB666]

1 hour ago, Steel said:

If I remember correctly there was a huge thread on this a while back where the (admittedly very spammy) OP got torn to shreds for arguing this interpretation 

I don't think it was exactly the same.

[WinkAllKerb'']

remind me: "the fact we are all different, is the reason we are all the same" ... yup but you autist should not talk and share ... you'r disturbing everyone with what you say and explain your way ...

 

if some peop' could make an effort at reading properly, that would be great ... but ah you know "exchange market and testicule ovum genocid invest" socio models work so well since 1929 ...

4 minutes ago, PB666 said:

I don't think it was exactly the same.

Edited May 19, 2016 by WinkAllKerb''

[PB666]

12 hours ago, PB666 said:

I don't think it was exactly the same.

The point they make that is interesting is that in spacetime nonlocality can be deteministic (bohrian-like) and non-deterministic (copenhagen-like) depending on the length of time between the resolution of two entangled events. As we know photons don't age, they don't have mass, so at SoL time stops, but not apparently quantum time. The deterministic wavefunction is ever so slowly tick-tocking. 

It is interesting that the interactions of space-time and qm require a few quantum tick-tock and that quantum jumps allow for distances considerably greater than planks length, the bohrian wavefunctions coukd have dimensions of the universe. 

In the context of the Cannae drive this could allow for things like electron orbitals with dimensions that are huge. 

Edited May 19, 2016 by PB666