Jump to content

RIDICULOUS OVERKILL SPACE MISSIONS!


Recommended Posts

Okay, I'm starting to tire of minimalistic SSTO designs. Sure, they're impressive, but they're impressive in their own way. I miss people creating rockets so large that the game would become a slide show, and I miss the intricate stagings of those rockets (As a bonus, add some non functioning stages, explode them somehow maybe, if your rocket is truly overkill, it should function without it). This isn't really a challenge challenge; It's more of a challenge of your creativity. SSTOs are allowed, but the must be BIG! 

(I have my own example here: (COMING SOON))

So, the main rules are:

1: Must be over 100 parts

2: No mods, I like seeing stock things.

3: Shouldn't be a replica of any existing mission (can be inspired)

4: Must at least go to the Mun.

5: And finally, record a video of your mission and send it here.

Want more difficulty? Here are some of the things to make my challenge harder

Regular Rules: Just follow the regular rules, but aside from that, completely custom.

Easy: Rocket, No explosion, no non functioning stages,

Medium: Rocket, At least one explosion. No non functioning stages

Hard: Rocket, 3 explosions, 1 non functioning stage stage.

Extreme: SSTO. Impress me with everything else about it.

Hope you enjoy my "challenge" and I really hope I get a killer overkill design!

Edited by HolidayTheDouche
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It started as an exercise to test the post 1.1 performance improvements and turned into an epic rescue.  790 parts when docked with the station.  581 Kerbals returned from the Mun. 
 

 

Edited by JebsDead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kerbin vonKerbal said:

Whackjob would be proud. I might try my hand at this later, however when you refer to SSTO's are you talking about spaceplanes? You mentioned staging but SSTO is Single Stage To Orbit. Just wanted some clarification. :)

Basically any kind of SSTO. SSTO space plane, or rocket.

The staging is a seperate thing. Sorry about being unclear with my words :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
19 minutes ago, macktruck6666 said:

Must have 100 parts? Really? I suggest the minimum part count should be 300.

Yeah. And that's not ridiculous overkill. I know the definition of ridiculous overkill. I have a 200 QBE satellite constellation around Dres and I don't even consider it overkill. Soooooo... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...