Jump to content

Impromptu EVAs on Landing...They're Real!


KevinTMC

Recommended Posts

With the coming implementation of EVAs, there\'s been debate over just how ridiculous it would be for kerbonauts to try to save themselves by jumping out of their craft just before crashing.

Apparently, it\'s not nearly so ridiculous as I\'d presumed...

'A plane towing an advertising banner has crashed just off shore at North Myrtle Beach, and witnesses say the pilot jumped to safety just before the aircraft hit the water.'

http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/07/18/2206246/banner-plane-crashes-off-north.html

So, if version 0.16 breaks the escape-tower mod, we\'ve still got a back-up plan! (So long as EVAs can be performed on an emergency, impromptu basis, that is...and really, would Jeb have it any other way?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, unless you can jump with enough speed to cancel out your velocity (and jumping at 100m/s is pretty much impossible), you\'re still gonna go splat. It *may* be possible to do it with the EVAPack thrusters, but it\'s gonna be a close call. Also, a parachute was probably attached to the pilot in question, and that\'s why he survived. If he didn\'t have a parachute, it wouldn\'t have mattered when he jumped; he would have died regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In atmosphere you might have more drag (and some maneuverability) as a skydiver than as a streamlined plane. Quite a few people have survived falling out of airplanes over the years, without working parachutes. It\'s obviously not a very safe way to land, but it is indeed possible. Iirc, the soviets once threw several hundred people out of aircraft at high altitude without chutes, over deep freshly- fallen soft snow. To their surprise, some 40 percent were more or less able to walk after impact. Jumping outside of the atmoshphere, though, might be less successful :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, unless you can jump with enough speed to cancel out your velocity (and jumping at 100m/s is pretty much impossible), you\'re still gonna go splat. It *may* be possible to do it with the EVAPack thrusters, but it\'s gonna be a close call. Also, a parachute was probably attached to the pilot in question, and that\'s why he survived. If he didn\'t have a parachute, it wouldn\'t have mattered when he jumped; he would have died regardless.

well yes and no, i mean people have survived falls at terminal velocity from aircraft in the past, theres no realy explination as to why, other then massive luck, but pending on the circumstance, it might be better to hit the ground/water solo, rather then inside your aircraft, which can explode, or crumble and break. im not saying theres anyway to actually decide which is the better choice, but theoretically it might be better in a situational basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In atmosphere you might have more drag (and some maneuverability) as a skydiver than as a streamlined plane. Quite a few people have survived falling out of airplanes over the years, without working parachutes. It\'s obviously not a very safe way to land, but it is indeed possible. Iirc, the soviets once threw several hundred people out of aircraft at high altitude without chutes, over deep freshly- fallen soft snow. To their surprise, some 40 percent were more or less able to walk after impact. Jumping outside of the atmoshphere, though, might be less successful :-)

I\'ve heard this story too, and I suspect it\'s an urban legend deliberately created by the VDV (Soviet, than Russian Airborne Troops) to promote their own 'macho badass' image. :) It doesn\'t seem grounded in reality, since before the VDV, the USSR had various amateur parachutist clubs, which pioneered their early experiences, and did use parachutes (just very poor one).

Plus, the number always change. One guy says it was 20 guys, someone else says it was a few hundred. Next, someone will say it was an entire Soviet Air Army, heh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the same situation the mythbusters did with a falling elevator and jumping up just before impact.

However in this case, landing in water at 20m/s (or whatever) is much preferable vs landing in water at 20m/s inside an aircraft.

It avoids the part where the front end of the vehicle slams into your head and breaks bones and locks you inside the craft and whatnot.

Sure it would still hurt like hell jumping out, but you have a better chance imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...