Jump to content

Engine Question


Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

 

I have a spaceb station orbiting Kerbin at 150km. I want to send a shuttle to orbit the Mun, then head back.

I can have 2 engines, and I was thinking about the atomic ones, but they have really low thrust.

 

What would you recommend for a Kerbin escape and Mun orbit and return to Kerbin orbit.

I can refuel at the station, in case you were wondering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Terrier is great for fairly small orbital shuttles.  It might actually be more fuel efficient than a nuke due to its lower mass.

If you want more thrust than a Terrier, the Poodle is about four times as powerful, and a bit more efficient.  But unless your shuttle is really big, the Poodle might be excessive.  You don't need all that much TWR once you've gotten to orbit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seconded. I use Terriers and Poodles unless there's a good reason to use something else (e.g. a design that requires radially-mounted engines, or a really small payload -- see below).

The nuclear engine is fantastic for big payloads and long distances (like sending a fully-stocked space station with lander and crew on an interplanetary mission), but for Mun/Minmus missions they're usually not worth it due to the mass and cost. Just use a Terrier or Poodle and pack a bit more fuel. (On interplanetary missions the TTW will be low, though, so your acceleration burn can easily last 15-20 minutes or so.)

Also, don't neglect the small engines: the much lower mass makes up for the somewhat lower efficiency if you're not going very far. I use Sparks for light local crewed missions and Ants for probes/satellites -- you'd be amazed at how far a minimal probe running on an Oscar and an Ant can go. I once used Sparks to return from Duna (I left my orbiter there and just flew the lander + extra crew module back).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on if you are going to be reusing the ship. If all your spacecraft are use-once disposable things, then a cheap small engine is a good idea. If you are going to be reusing this thing dozens of times, then the efficiency of the nuke will easily pay for itself over time in fuel savings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...