Jump to content

Electric Propulsion: Lasers and Rail Guns


Racescort666

Recommended Posts

I realized that after I wrote this post, I found out that this exists already in the form of pulsed plasma thrusters. Rather than deleting the post, what does everyone think about pulsed plasma thrusters?

I was thinking about laser ablation as a means of propulsion since it's basically one of the proposals for asteroid redirect when I started to think about it for spacecraft propulsion. Laser ablation by itself probably has pretty terrible ISP so why not accelerate the gasses via electromagnetic propulsion? The propellant could be literally anything but probably an inexpensive inert metal would work the best (maybe?). 

Please excuse the crudeness of this, I literally spent 5 minutes in SolidWorks drawing it. So the 3 parts to it are the fuel which gets fed into one end of the engine, the laser that ablates the fuel, and an electromagnetic accelerator to eject the fuel at high velocity. 

Hypothetically, you'd like it to be adjustable because as you ablate it away it would need to be repositioned closer to the laser. There would probably need to be a shroud of some kind to keep the molten metal contained which I didn't draw. Then the accelerator accelerates said ablated material out the back as reaction mass. Exit of the engine is at the right of the picture.

So2B4mv.jpg

I really have no idea if something like this would even work much less work well enough as a propulsion system so what's everyone else think? Someone may have thought of this already and there's something that I'm missing that makes this a dumb idea. I don't know, I'm not really that involved in novel spacecraft propulsion.

A drawback of this design would be the power consumption. I don't know how much power this would require to be feasible or if it would even be on par with existing ion/hall effect thrusters. 

I would think that a benefit would be having an inexpensive, easy to store fuel. You wouldn't need a high pressure gas tank on the spacecraft or really a tank of any kind. Hypothetically, it would be easy to refuel if it came back to Earth, just add a new chunk of metal to the engine. Fuel package space would be considerably less than existing ion/hall effect thrusters

Maybe I'm not thinking about this right but at a high level, it's this: ablate solid with laser, accelerate ablated products. Would this work or not? What would you have to look out for if it hypothetically worked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a dumb idea because conceptually it should work. What you've got is basically a space-going MALDI (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation) injector feeding into a linear accelerator.

How well it would work and how it would compare to other ion drives though, I don't know. I suspect that for any spacecraft bigger than a satellite you'll be faced with the usual problem of finding a suitable power supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit of confusion in the terminology here. What you're describing as fuel is actually the propellant or reaction mass. The fuel would be what you'd chuck into the power generator to power this thing. Note that if you have solar panels, your fuel is essentially limitless :cool:

The EM accelerator on the right looks like some sort of coilgun. While a single coil would be effective, you can increase the specific impulse by using multiple stages of coils. When the plasma reaches the center of the first coil, the second coil would be activated (and the first killed), so the plasma would accelerate some more. This continues until the last coil, giving the thruster an improved exhaust velocity.

And yes, you put forward a good point - this would consume quite a bit of power. I'm guessing you can get by with solar panels for smaller applications such as satellite OMS, but larger things like manned spacecrafts would need either big panels or fuel cells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...