Jump to content

Mach Effect Thrusters: Humanity to the Stars


Zeiss Ikon

Recommended Posts

I don't know if that's what we're getting, though. In video I've linked above, authors of the paper appear claim that their rough estimates on thrust experienced by loop of wire is roughly what they're getting. Now, I have not run these numbers, nor have I read the paper, so I'm going purely from the claim as reported in the video, but that sounds like tether is exactly what they got. Don't get me wrong, I'm not about to knock tethers, but I don't see an indication of a path to a more compact design. It's still a wire carrying current. You either increase its length, or you increase the current to get the thrust you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, K^2 said:

I don't know if that's what we're getting, though. In video I've linked above, authors of the paper appear claim that their rough estimates on thrust experienced by loop of wire is roughly what they're getting. Now, I have not run these numbers, nor have I read the paper, so I'm going purely from the claim as reported in the video, but that sounds like tether is exactly what they got. Don't get me wrong, I'm not about to knock tethers, but I don't see an indication of a path to a more compact design. It's still a wire carrying current. You either increase its length, or you increase the current to get the thrust you need.

Right. I haven't read the paper either, but from Manley's video it sounds like the effect is a coupling between the circuit powering the resonance chamber and the magnetic field of the Earth. 

If the effect was actually located inside the resonance chamber, then we'd have a path to a more compact tether design. But so far there has been no indication of this.

Current tether designs (no pun intended) use electrical current. I wonder if a physically rotating object with an electrostatic charge (think two loops of wire forming a capacitor) could be more compact/efficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sevenperforce said:

Right. I haven't read the paper either, but from Manley's video it sounds like the effect is a coupling between the circuit powering the resonance chamber and the magnetic field of the Earth. 

If the effect was actually located inside the resonance chamber, then we'd have a path to a more compact tether design. But so far there has been no indication of this.

Current tether designs (no pun intended) use electrical current. I wonder if a physically rotating object with an electrostatic charge (think two loops of wire forming a capacitor) could be more compact/efficient.

Wire doesn't form a capacitor, but perhaps two high resistance wires (megaohms or such) keeping two capacitors apart might be what you are thinking.  I still doubt that such a design makes sense outside the Earth's magnetic field.

Do probes to Jupiter's moons us electromagnetic propulsion?  It is said to have a beast of a field, although you'd presumably need plenty of non-magnetic propulsion to get there.  I know Mars doesn't have such a field, does Venus?  It would at least allow a slingshot between Venus and Earth using only electromagnetic propulsion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wumpus said:

Wire doesn't form a capacitor, but perhaps two high resistance wires (megaohms or such) keeping two capacitors apart might be what you are thinking.  I still doubt that such a design makes sense outside the Earth's magnetic field.

Do probes to Jupiter's moons us electromagnetic propulsion?  It is said to have a beast of a field, although you'd presumably need plenty of non-magnetic propulsion to get there.  I know Mars doesn't have such a field, does Venus?  It would at least allow a slingshot between Venus and Earth using only electromagnetic propulsion.

You could pack positive and negative charge on two separated wires.

Difficulty with electromagnetic propulsion in the Jovian system is power; solar power is in short supply out there.

Venus has no meaningful magnetic field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sevenperforce said:

You could pack positive and negative charge on two separated wires.

Difficulty with electromagnetic propulsion in the Jovian system is power; solar power is in short supply out there.

Venus has no meaningful magnetic field.

Wires don't like to store charge (which is why they are good at moving it around, it doesn't stick to them).  Plates like charge.  You'd only manage to cover the silhouette of the wire with charge, which doesn't have much point.  Wires *will* store current (and have measurable inductance), but I've never heard of anyone worrying about the capacitance of a wire (although it has to exist in transmission lines, but has no real effect other than establishing an impedance to go with the inductance).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, wumpus said:

Wires don't like to store charge (which is why they are good at moving it around, it doesn't stick to them).  Plates like charge.  You'd only manage to cover the silhouette of the wire with charge, which doesn't have much point.  Wires *will* store current (and have measurable inductance), but I've never heard of anyone worrying about the capacitance of a wire (although it has to exist in transmission lines, but has no real effect other than establishing an impedance to go with the inductance).

Yeah, I get that. Was thinking of something more like a ribbon. Trying to figure out if there is a geometry wherein counter-rotating helical ribbon capacitors would couple linearly to the Earth's magnetic field lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having trouble looking up at what voltage capacitors will start to leak due to field electron emission, as that's going to be limiting factor on charge. Second limiting factor is mechanical strength. That one's easier. You can get steel wire loop going at about 500m/s regardless of loop radius and wire diameter. That isn't much. Gut feeling is that you'll get stronger current with superconducting wire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. Just saw the reports on the latest tests... Turns out that the w.t.f. in "w.t.f. Thruster" actually stands for "Well, that failed". :sticktongue:

EDIT: ... Seriously? That's censored?

*sigh* *tries different tack*

YAY! Works.

Edited by MaverickSawyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...