Jump to content

KSP 1.8 and Scaled Display on MacOS


Recommended Posts

So I'm running KSP 1.8 in windowed mode (1280x800) on my MacBook Pro / Catalina and the KSP window is very small, and UI elements are disproportionately large, except for the orbit lines in map mode, where the numbers (speed, altitude etc.) are very small.

Running a similar config in 1.73 (also windowed, but at 1280x720) does not exhibit the same behavior. This behavior was the same for KSP 1.6x, 1.5x and 1.4x as well. The primary difference being that the 1.73 install has some sort of global scaling factor applied to the entire window (not the individual elements such as UI_SCALE_XXX values), bringing the window size up to a reasonable size, while having all of the the UI elements sized reasonably well.

In the 1.73 instance, in the Settings|Graphics tab the Screen Resolution is set to "custom", while the settings.cfg file values are SCREEN_RESOLUTION_WIDTH = 1280 and SCREEN_RESOLUTION_HEIGHT = 720. The various UI_SCALE_XXX values are "1".

In the 1.8 instance, in the Settings|Graphics tab the Screen Resolution is set to 1280x800, while the settings.cfg file values are SCREEN_RESOLUTION_WIDTH = 1280 and SCREEN_RESOLUTION_HEIGHT = 800. The various UI_SCALE_XXX values are "1".

I'm guessing that it is something to do with the Unity upgrade, but don't know where to start looking for a fix. Is it possible to somehow add a scaling factor in KSP 1.8 to the entire window?

Edited by CaffeineAddict
finished post after accidentally hitting submit :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe I'm experiencing the same issue on OS X El Capitan.  I run in windowed mode at 1280 x 800, which was sufficiently large in 1.7.x, but in 1.8 the window is annoyingly small at the same resolution.  Apparently it is halving the window size as setting the resolution to 2560 x 1600 gives a window the size of 1280 x 800.  The only workaround I've found thus far is to set the resolution to 2560 x 1600 , and the UI scale to 1.5.  The only issue I can find with this is a drop in fps because it seems to behave as though it is displaying at 2560 x 1600, but is shrunk down to about the 1280 x 800 size.  1.7.2 runs smoothly at 1280 x 800 on my late 2015 MacBook Pro, and the high screen resolution is the only difference between the two instances.

Edited by TheShadow1138
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...