Jump to content

Dual propellent tank?!


Arugela

Recommended Posts

I'm assuming aircraft with lift can get off the ground with less than 1.0 TWR. I think bombers usually do like 0.6 according to wiki. Could be wrong though.

What about supercavitation in the lower atmosphere to reduce drag to improve the lift. I haven't gone over this yet, but I think the drag coeeficitient for a 90 degree shape is 0.8. If cavitation helped it might improve it more.

Assuming this works this way. If the drag coeeficient let it get off the ground with x% less thrust. 36000/0.8 = 45000 then It has effective thrust from the lift. If the difference from 90 degrees to 60 degrees is 1.5 modifier then 80/1.5 = 53.3333..... This gives effective thrust of 67500 tons. Just enough to fly fundamentally. I'm assuming I'm probably missing something though(And that that is probably not how it works.). I think the max expected weight on takeoff with full fuel is 64,000 tons.

I still haven't gotten through the formulas for this to know how it works though. But if it close to correct there might be a chance at hypothetically working.

I wonder how much you could use air intakes to supplement the lox in general while still in the atmosphere.

Edit: I changed the craft to have(absolute max fuel) 13500 tons lch4 + 51300 tons lox = 64800 tons fuel + 6480 tons body+cargo(4320 body + 2160 cargo) = 71820 tons on takeoff. The engines are raptor 2's with presumed chamber pressure of 360 atm, 300 tons thrust each, fuel rate of 312.5lb/s=45000lb/s lch4(might be wrong.) @144 engines(1500lb/[email protected]*144=216000lbs/sec/2000=108tons/sec). With a flight time of 10 minutes and a maximum thrust of 43200 on takeoff the only hope is the vehicle can get off the ground with around a 0.53333 coeeficient to lift. If that even makes any sense. The delta v would then be with a ln(11) coeeficient on takeoff.

Body dimensions: 432*250*144 = 15552000/6 = 2592000 ft3/20= 129600ft3 empty space/surface area/2.4 = 54000ft3 cargospace@80lbs/ft3 and wing surface area.

 

The downside is that is has a wing loading on takeoff of 2640 lbs/ft2. With about160-240lb/ft2 (no cargo/cargo) wing loading empty. So, it needs lots of structural strength.

 

Edited by Arugela
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...