SLS or Constellation?

[rkman]

I support colonization over exploration.

Sure, let's not first look if there's a reason to go there, but just go there - counter to all colonization that has taken place so far.

All the science can wait.

I'm not sure NASA is happy with that sort of fanboyism.

[NASAFanboy]

Sure, let's not first look if there's a reason to go there, but just go there - counter to all colonization that has taken place so far.

I'm not sure NASA is happy with that sort of fanboyism.

\

Why do you feel the need to quote things from 10 pages ago?

Or are you doing this just to annoy me?

[rkman]

\

Why do you feel the need to quote things from 10 pages ago?

Is it not relevant anymore, did you change your mind?

Or are you doing this just to annoy me?

Because i think you are wrong there.

[NASAFanboy]

Is it not relevant anymore, did you change your mind?

Because i think you are wrong there.

No, because I was offering an arguement to counter someone elses argument. In cases like these, I may bend or stretch my viewpoints.

But anyways, I support manned spaceflight.

[gutza1]

I'm actually all for SLS. I think that NASA should make "the biggest bang for its buck" by going to places that humans have never been before, like an asteroid or Mars. In my opinion China can have the Moon if we land on Mars first.

[Skyler4856]

NASA has realized that they gain funding via public support. Most individuals couldn't care less about curiosity, but bring up apollo or the shuttles, most people light up.