Jump to content

What causes the Oberth effect


Recommended Posts

You don't get any extra delta-V. Delta-V is fixed by engine and fuel. You get extra energy, however. You get extra energy because the power output of a rocket engine is Thrust * Velocity. The faster you go, the higher your delta-E becomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to think of it this way: The total energy of the system rocket+fuel+exhaust has to be conserved (basic physics, conservation of energy). Now if you dump your fuel somewhere near a planet, your exhaust gas has a very small potential energy, because it's deep inside the gravity well. Therefore, you must get a lot of kinetic energy for the rocket. On the other hand, burning far away from a planet leaves your exhaust gas with quite some potential energy, which you in return will not have available for your vessel.

This is also why we usually use delta-v to measure a rockets performance and not energy: delta-v is constant, but the kinetic energy you can get out of this delta-v depends on where you burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

K^2 is correct, though when I try to explain it to someone without a physics background, I simplify it to "you gain velocity as you enter a gravity well. If you then speed up before you leave, gravity has less time to reduce your velocity, so you don't lose as much as you gained on the way in." The actual math though, has to do with the non 1:1 relationship of delta-V and kinetic energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a consequence of how kinetic energy and rockets work. Since kinetic energy is proportional to velocity^2 and rockets work by giving a set amount of delta-v regardless of your initial velocity it's kind of easy to see that the total increase in kinetic energy will be higher if your initial velocity is higher. A graph to demonstrate this:

N514YTN.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but what is the velocity based on? the body the vessel is currently orbiting?

what about Oberthing while prograde around the earth AND prograde around the sun? (burning while periapsis is on the dark side of the earth) earth orbit speed plus sun orbit speed

would that have less of an oberth effect than if you burned while prograde around the earth but retrograde around the sun? (burning while on the bright side of the earth) sun orbit speed minus earth orbit speed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but you also have to take into consideration that as your mass decreases (Burning fuel) your kinetic energy wont have the maximum amount of increase in kinetic energy as the equation for Kinetic energy is .5*Mass*velocity(squared) meaning if you increase your velocity 5 m/s then you would lose an equal amount of fuel that decreases your mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but what is the velocity based on? the body the vessel is currently orbiting?

what about Oberthing while prograde around the earth AND prograde around the sun? (burning while periapsis is on the dark side of the earth) earth orbit speed plus sun orbit speed

would that have less of an oberth effect than if you burned while prograde around the earth but retrograde around the sun? (burning while on the bright side of the earth) sun orbit speed minus earth orbit speed

If you only consider the gravitational forces from a single body at a time like KSP does, then Oberth effect in different positions around the orbit is the same. The potential energy of your solar orbit is almost the same on the day side versus the night side of a planet, so there's not much solar Oberth difference. But ejecting from a planetary orbit in the planet's prograde direction is the best way to transfer to planets further out, and ejecting in the planet's retrograde direction is the best way to transfer to planets closer in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but what is the velocity based on? the body the vessel is currently orbiting?

what about Oberthing while prograde around the earth AND prograde around the sun? (burning while periapsis is on the dark side of the earth) earth orbit speed plus sun orbit speed

would that have less of an oberth effect than if you burned while prograde around the earth but retrograde around the sun? (burning while on the bright side of the earth) sun orbit speed minus earth orbit speed

Oberth effect is described purely in terms of kinetic energy, and kinetic energy is a frame-dependent quantity. In other words, it all depends on what you are trying to do. For operations around Earth, all you care about is kinetic energy with respect to Earth's center of mass. In which case, it doesn't matter where you are in relation to the Sun. If, in contrast, your final destination is elsewhere in the Solar system, and you'll be fighting the Solar gravitational well, then it is motion relative to the Sun that's most relevant.

Frame-dependence of energy is something you have to always be very careful with. If you pick accelerated frame of reference, you even lose the conservation of energy as a principle. It's a big part of why Oberth effect exists in the first place, and why you shouldn't be just taking it for granted. You shoudl work out the entire problem as a whole, and not just be trying to find the "fastest" place to burn. Because fastest relative to what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...