Jump to content

Lander and Rover: Is there a better way to do it


Recommended Posts

I am a new player (playing now for about a week) and have designed a Lander/Rover combo that can go to the Mun or Minmus, but it looks ugly and is incredibly complex to stage (it basically uses a skycrane after landing). Here is what it looks like.

?id=150086291

Is there a better way to do this, or have I inadvertently found the best way to combine landers and rovers?

Edited by ls612
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFFC0F262795892FDF8C675B644BCAA1F59A5F51

Fixed. :)

Instead of having a Poodle engine below that fuel tank, try putting four LV-909s radially. Then, stick the rover below the lander so when you land the lander, you can simply decouple the rover onto the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not build your rocket stack with the rover UNDER the lander (I assume the service module there is intended to land and not remain in orbit, because you gave it lander legs).

That way your lander also acts as the skycrane for the rover and you don't need a separate skycrane for the rover. You hover the lander to a near stop above the ground, drop the rover from underneath it, then deflect the lander aside a little bit and land it. (Or, if you use landing legs long enough and the rover is short enough, you might even be able to just land the lander with the rover still attached and then drop the rover from there.)

[edit: oh I see that was already rryy's suggestion. I just misread that post.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I do it, the skycrane is the lander:

screenshot338_zpsff7c39e5.png

It might not look it, but this thing can easily land on Tylo.

The tanks are attached to decouplers so they will eject after landing. Just stick a decoupler on the bottom, and a rocket under that, and you've got a lander for anywhere*

(* May not have return capability on all worlds)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of integrating the skycrane into the rover. . .

p><p>Stuff like that.  For most moderate

For smaller ones, I usually pack them on top(bottom, since the LM is inverted) of the LM with a docking port. (make sure to include a probe body so it can control itself)

p><p>When I

Hope this helps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixed. :)

Instead of having a Poodle engine below that fuel tank, try putting four LV-909s radially. Then, stick the rover below the lander so when you land the lander, you can simply decouple the rover onto the surface.

I like this idea the best, thanks. Note that the top is the Escape tower, the skycrane is underneath it. Now I just need to find the Polar Mun Arch.

Also, what was causing my image to not show? I thought I had done the BBCode correctly.

Edited by ls612
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this idea the best, thanks.

Also, what was causing my image to not show? I thought I had done the BBCode correctly.

The image link you use has to only show the image and no other stuff around it. The link you used, http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=150086291 , had other stuff around the picture, but clicking on the picture would lead you to this link, http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/594753342785873146/AFFC0F262795892FDF8C675B644BCAA1F59A5F51/ , which shows only the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...