Should there be an internal review system for Suggestions?

[chaos_forge]

Ah, **** it. September is a long way away. If needs be, I can hand the torch to someone else. Expect a first post (hopefully) by 2AM CST.

EDIT: Whoa, I didn't know the forums had auto-censoring. Hope I didn't break any rules . . .

Edited August 7, 2013 by chaos_forge

[allmappedout]

Ah, **** it. September is a long way away. If needs be, I can hand the torch to someone else. Expect a first post (hopefully) by 2AM CST.

EDIT: Whoa, I didn't know the forums had auto-censoring. Hope I didn't break any rules . . .

Cheers chaos forge I am happy to give you a hand collating stuff; just drop me a PM with what you need from me and I'll get to work on it. I never have much else to do at work anyway

[chaos_forge]

Cheers chaos forge I am happy to give you a hand collating stuff; just drop me a PM with what you need from me and I'll get to work on it. I never have much else to do at work anyway

Actually, Scoundrel and I just got done organizing a huge list. xD Thanks for the offer though!

[allmappedout]

Actually, Scoundrel and I just got done organizing a huge list. xD Thanks for the offer though!

Bravo chaps, just seen it! As I said, any assistance required, let me know, I'm more than happy to help!

[Tex_NL]

...

You see' date=' no matter what we do, we can't force people to read if they don't want to without some ridiculous scheme.

...[/quote']

Actually, you can. And it isn't that difficult. You could trigger a pop-up as soon as the 'suggestion' tag is selected.

Even if only a few people actually read the pop-up and decide not to post their suggestion. Every useless old suggestion not posted is a win.

For example: This suggestion Clouds. The poster has only 9 posts and joined the forum less than a week ago. He clearly states he did search an apologizes in advance if it has already been suggested. Obviously he simply did not see the 'What not to suggest'. A guy like that would have been helped immensely by a pop-up showing him how things are done.

P.S.

Good to see a mod/admin/whatever getting involved in this subject.

[Fifi]

Btw. What about adding this on the list of already suggested:

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/44506-Making-the-procedural-terrain-generator-to-make-some-flat-areas-on-Duna-too

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/44622-Ability-to-set-vessel-type-in-VAB-SPH

And that non-mine one:

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/44813-Change-vehicle-Tree-structure-%28single-parent%29-to-adjacency-matrix-%28multi-parent%29

[Sudslv]

*BUMP*

A year has passed and nothing has been done. this is really good idea, it would enable a voting system - Like/Dislike so devs could really see what community wants. it isn't too hard to implement and would make massive difference and help improve the gameplay.

[chaos_forge]

Something HAS been done . . . the already suggested list is stickied. Also, please don't necrothread.

[Sky_walker]

I would say that necroing threads in this section is perfectly allowed if not to say: encouraged. Otherwise we'll keep on getting new topic on exact same issues with exact same arguments repeated over and over again. Pointless and only fills the forum with garbage.

It's much better if people bother to use search function and necro something old.

[chaos_forge]

I would say that necroing threads in this section is perfectly allowed if not to say: encouraged. Otherwise we'll keep on getting new topic on exact same issues with exact same arguments repeated over and over again. Pointless and only fills the forum with garbage.

It's much better if people bother to use search function and necro something old.

You have a good point, sir or madam. I rescind my previous statement.