How Do you think Ksp Will change if they added Bearings?

[jie321]

.

Edited July 16, 2019 by jie321

[GusTurbo]

Yes, I think bearings would add a lot of new and creative design possibilities. I hope they become a stock feature in the future.

[LaydeeDem]

As you can tell, I would really enjoy stock bearings.

[RocketPilot573]

Probably in .57.3.1234224243463558326563536523563275235238654 (there will be a LOT of Dev Builds)

[Lazro]

Bearings would definitely be a game-changer. Low-profile hinges would change it as well.

[FITorion]

I just want rotating docking ports... but bearings would also be welcome.

[Ralathon]

For me personally it wouldn't change much to be honest.

I already play with Infernal Robotics and I don't use those parts often at all. Probably the inner engineer that screams "You idiot! No way that's structurally sound! Keep the damn thing rigid!" whenever I try something fancy like swiveling engines etc.

Main thing I use bearings for is artificial gravity sections for stations and rover deployment (they usually end up in a vertical landing config for me).

[Frederf]

Helicopters (well, autogyros) and centrifugal living quarters are all I can think of.

[Needles_10]

That'd be GREAT. I'd probably play it even MORE than I do now, and I play KSP a hell of a lot.