Jump to content

KSP Performance Question


henryrasia

Recommended Posts

Probably the CPU is the most intensely used component. These days, CPUs like your Intel i7 have multiple cores, which in most circumstances act like multiple CPUs to divvy up the processing work. It's a feature that is called multithreading, but unfortunately KSP doesn't make use of this feature. So what's more important than the number of cores your CPU has (whether it be 2, 4, 6 or 8) is how fast its clock speed is (2.8, 3.0, 3.2gigaherz), etc.

For example, having a high clock speed will allow the game to run better because even though a program with multithreading utilization can use all 8 cores of a 2.6gigaherz octo-core CPU to do calculations really fast, a no-multithreading program like KSP can only use the 8 cores as if they were a single core clocked at 2.6 gigaherz, which is pretty slow these days for calculation intense games such as KSP.

Also, while it's obviously good to have a decent graphics card in KSP, it's not as important as it would be for a game like Crysis because KSP doesn't use graphics cards nearly as much as it utilizes the CPU.

Finally, anything over like 6gb of RAM should be enough memory as the game doesn't use more than 2 or 3gb IIRC

*** This is all an overgeneralization

Edited by hobbsyoyo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...