iamwearingpants Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Personally I like the bertha, but I think it would work as a 1 meter. It's really not that wide, and I think it could fit as a 1 meter fine without the extruding top.On topic, I would love to see all of those possibilities be realities, especially the 7-way configuration. Also, any chance of some new couplers? A 6-way would be great for large rocket's first stage! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
venku122 Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 No2m parts made by sunday punch will go better with the other parts already made by sunday punchYou could at least make some alternatives to the medium bertha 2m engineThat thing is a massive POSNova's 2m parts and 2m-3m adapters work great with sunday punch's parts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSheep Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 What I'd like to know is how those retro-rocket modules are supposed to work. When I've tried sticking them on a rocket, when one retrorocket module fires at stage separation, ALL the retrorocket module also fire, regardless of stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdfox Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Have you tried putting the retrorocket into the stage used with the coupler you're gonna blow? I've done that with the ullage motors available from CaptSlug, and it works great (except for stages near the top tumbling violently when the ullage motors fire, but that's not due to staging, it's due to my incompetent design). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semininja Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 I can no longer find said ullage motors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdfox Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 They're in the radial booster pack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 :probe: New version of my parts pack! :probe:And it's a major overhaul too. I've now got 2 metre parts as an intermediate size in between the existing 1 and 3 metre sizes (should be compatible with the other third party 2 metre parts), decoupler shrouds and adapters to make all the different sizes work together, two new 3 metre multi-adapters, a nose cone with a parachute slot, vernier rockets, a light decoupler, an aerodynamic radial stack decoupler, a new 3 metre tank, a modular 2 metre payload shroud system and probably some others I forgot about.Here's some example rockets using the new parts:Change list for 0.9 - 23 new parts!New part - 1, 2 and 3 metre adapter frustums - 6 partsNew part - 2 metre decoupler shrouds - 2 partsNew part - Modular 2 metre payload fairing - panel segment and nosecone segmentNew part - 2 metre fuel tankNew part - 2 metre to 2X1 metre adapterNew part - 3 metre to 2 metre narrowing adapterNew part - 2 metre to 1 metre narrowing adapterNew part - 3 metre decoupler shroudNew part - 3 metre to 5X1 metre adapter (fits within 3 metre footprint)New part - 3 metre to 7X1 metre adapter (fits within 3 metre footprint)New part - Aero decoupler, radial decoupler with 1 metre stack attach pointNew part - Long 3 metre fuel tankNew part - Light decouplerNew part - 1 metre to parachute adpaterNew part - Vernier radial SAS unitNew part - Delta planform finReworked configs for fuel tanksReworked masses of many partsGreatly increased strength of 3 metre parts (40X)Switched couplers and adapters to 'Strut' module Sunday Punch's parts package v 1.09 contents*1, 2 and 3 metre adapter frustums - 6 parts*2 metre decoupler shrouds - 2 parts*Modular 2 metre payload fairing - panel segment and nosecone segment*2 metre fuel tank*2 metre to 2X1 metre adapter*3 metre to 2 metre narrowing adapter*2 metre to 1 metre narrowing adapter*3 metre decoupler shroud*3 metre to 5X1 metre adapter (fits within 3 metre footprint)*3 metre to 7X1 metre adapter (fits within 3 metre footprint)*Aero decoupler, radial decoupler with 1 metre stack attach point*Long 3 metre fuel tank*Light decoupler*1 metre to parachute adpater*Vernier radial SAS unit*Delta planform fin*1 metre to 3 metre adapter*3 metre to 1 metre adapter*Aerodynamic nosecone*3 metre decoupler*1X3 metre to 5X1 metre coupler*3 metre engine cluster*Dual coupler, 2 versions*Quad coupler*Escape tower*3 metre fuel tank*Lateral coupler, 2 versions*Medium liquid engine*Medium solid motor*NERVA engine*RCS module*Retrorocket module*Small fuel tank*Small solid motor*small liquid engine*Decoupler shroud, 3 lengths*Decoupler matching decoupler shrouds appearance*long 1 metre fuel tank*high thrust liquid engine*lateral tricoupler, 2 versions*3 metre decoupler shroud for 4X liquid clusterGet Sunday Punch's KSP parts v1.09 here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shade Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 You seem to have included a duplicate of the stock 'fuelTank' part in this download. Checked the stats, and they're identical, so no harm done if anyone overwrites though.Other than that, excellent job Been using the older releases plenty, and it's awesome to get an updated one to go with the final 0.9 release. Many thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 Yeah I just noticed that. When I zip up all the parts I just get them from my own parts folder and must have accidentally selected the fueltank folder. Whoops! I might upload it again with that taken out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 Also I just got the new version and it appears to have broken all of my adapters, they don't flow fuel properly. Hmmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt'n Skunky Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Also I just got the new version and it appears to have broken all of my adapters, they don't flow fuel properly. Hmmm.There was a new fuel flow tag added that you might need to look at.Arrr!Capt'n Skunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
affonso100 Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 hmmm, how do you place the new top payload thingy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 You attach them to the stack node on the fairing panel. But you can't because I disabled that node while testing something, then forgot to reenable it! I'm uploading a version with that fixed and fuel flowing properly through the adapters right now, so just hang tight for a few minutes.I'm pretty bad at this whole 'not totally screwing up new releases' business huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 I feel like my parts are pointless now :CThese are so much better than mine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feanor Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 I feel like my parts are pointless now :CI disagree.Your engines are one of the few 2m diameter engines. Your parts are a bit smaller, and dare I say, feel more realistic. Also, your 2 to 1 meter and 3 to 2 meter adapters and the like hold fuel; this package does not. Nosecones have a diffirent approach as well.although it would be a good idea to agree between part makers what exactly 2 meters is. because these are certainly diffirent in size, which irks me a bit.Sunday punch - I like it, now make it work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 Nah it's more like a symbiotic relationship. You have a proper 2 metre engine for example.Although I do plan to make some of those and other new 2 and 3 metre parts at some point...edit: Yeah what Feanor said.Here's the fixed pack (fuel flowing couplers, fairing panels):http://www.multiupload.com/MZ96BWC5ZX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdfox Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Man, that booster in the shroud demo sure looks like the Saturn INT-20. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_INT-20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Hmm. Maybe I'll rename my 2 meter parts to 1.75 meter parts, and make an adapter to proper 2 meter parts...We could make small changes in width, like in the Ariane 4 rocket.Or, if your parts actually are LARGER than two meters, I could keep the title =p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feanor Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Hmm. Maybe I'll rename my 2 meter parts to 1.75 meter parts, and make an adapter to proper 2 meter parts...We could make small changes in width, like in the Ariane 4 rocket.Or, if your parts actually are LARGER than two meters, I could keep the title =pthis would be ideal.It shouldnt be too hard to see who is right, though? I mean, files like diameter are pretty easy to see if there is a 1 or less/more..thank you both, by the way, for the awesome work you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 Hmm. Maybe I'll rename my 2 meter parts to 1.75 meter parts, and make an adapter to proper 2 meter parts...We could make small changes in width, like in the Ariane 4 rocket.Or, if your parts actually are LARGER than two meters, I could keep the title =pMine are exactly 2 metres in diameter, it seemed simpler to work in whole numbers. Of course 2 parts of the same nominal diameter may not line up exactly if one cylinder has 18 sides and the other 12 or 24, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Mine all use 18 sides, so that's not a problem. I suppose I'll get to work renaming my 2m parts to 1.75m.What should I name the folders, though? It feels weird having a decimal in the folder name, but having '175m_fueltank' just looks silly.Also, SP, I hope you merged all your objects into one this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt'n Skunky Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 What should I name the folders, though? It feels weird having a decimal in the folder name, but having '175m_fueltank' just looks silly.1750cm_fueltank? LOLArrr!Capt'n Skunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Punch Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 Well you could always go with 175cm instead of 1.75 metres. The wonders of the metric system! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Damn this country for not using metric! I should have thought of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baker Easy Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Oh my god, that's a Saturn IB. I fucking love you man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts