.

[Guest]

.

Edited December 13, 2016 by RevanCorana

[Weegee]

Looks cool! But is there any reason it needs gigantors? That's a tad excessive.

And consider renaming the SSTO, if you want to see tiny check out SSI.

[Guest]

.

Edited December 13, 2016 by RevanCorana

[SofusRud]

part count?

[Guest]

87 parts .

[inigma]

It shows promise. Rip off half or more of the wings, and try to limit your parts to bare bones, and think about shrinking up the footprint, and you will have a shuttlecraft candidate worthy of SSI inclusion. Feel free to submit when ready. See my sig for the link.

[Guest]

.

Edited December 13, 2016 by RevanCorana

[The Destroyer]

Not bad. Not the smallest SSTO ever, but it's a good start for building small. Hint: Oxidizer-less fuel tanks, thanks to tweakables, and intakes!

...and RTGS.

[Pds314]

Yeah. I wouldn't quite call it tiny. Small, yes, but not tiny. When I think of tiny I think of an SSTO spaceplane with an FL-200 or FL-400 for fuel and a mk II cockpit with an intake on the front.

Out of curiosity, what are the specs? How much delta-V does it get after you get it to orbit?

[Guest]

.

Edited December 13, 2016 by RevanCorana

[Ravenchant]

Looking good! A bit heavy on the wings, but it has that sort of utilitarian style...

What is RTGS?

RTGs. Generators. You know, plutonium That would probably mitigate the need for gigantors and shave off some extra weight.