Jump to content

Atmospheric Degredation


Red Dwarf

Recommended Posts

Would they still magically be alive and edible? Because if not, all animals would easily starve way before carbon dioxide poisoning (let alone oxygen deprivation) becomes a problem, and then only geological processes are left to influence the atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess so. In the story I'm writing, the plants and other oxygen-making lifeforms are infected with a virus, which stops them producing breathable air. They're still there, but they aren't doing anything. It is probable that animals would starve, but that isn't really my question. I care more about the atmosphere itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Humans are animals, too. With a slightly better food supply management, granted, but they would still all starve before they suffocate. Basic estimate: Imagine you burn all organic material, calculate how much CO2 that is going to release. It's not enough to get to toxic levels. And no matter what you do, no biological process would be able to release more CO2.

If you want suffocation to be a risk, have your virus "reverse" photosynthesis so it extracts oxygen from the air somehow (and faster than animals would do it) or modify it so that all plants now produce a more toxic waste product, like cyanide acid. Or just pick a number and apply suspension of disbelief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the heterotrophs would starve long before the level of oxygen drops down below tolerable physiological levels for any of them. It would probably take a few thousands of years before oxygen is reduced into compounds. After that, life would go on for anaerobic bacteria and their parasitic viruses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't stop the metabolism of plants and still expect them to life. If plants stop "producing" oxygen, that means they stoped growing. They will die and all animals and humans will starve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that :P Whether or not the plants are still alive or not doesn't matter. My question was more about how the planet itself would be affected by their absence. Everything dying is a foregone conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you understand what plants do red dwarf. Plants don't just produce oxygen for no good reason. Oxygen is a by-product of photosynthesis which produces sugar from a combination of carbon dioxide and chlorophyll, this sugar goes into a process called cellular respiration which converts sugar and water to ATP and carbon dioxide ATP is a cell's main source of energy animal or plant. So knowing this this means there is no way for a virus to make a plant produce unbreathable air before the plant dies and the oxygen to carbon dioxide ratio is high enough that there is more oxygen made than carbon dioxide. A better scenario would be if all plant life died and the fungus population skyrocket producing carbon dioxide while most species of animal a reduced to a strict fungi diet meaning that the humans and other animals would live long enough to experience oxygen deprivation and carbon dioxide poisoning. So what then?

Note: I was trying to refine his theory so that it would be more clear or flawless to figure out how long we would have.

P.S. Sorry for a whole science lesson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...