Jump to content

Anyone else see this announcement from Boeing?


Kitworks

Recommended Posts

The image is only something DARPA knocked up. Despite the name, the requirement isn't actually for a winged vehicle, and there's a good chance they'll produce a more conventional-looking VTVL rocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, given the requirement, I suspect that Boeing would prefer to build a winged vehicle, since this is merely a first stage. In fact, I suspect that said winged vehicle will look suspiciously like it shares its wings and engines with the 747-8, but with a body designed specifically for the mission to allow the booster to be dropped from it without the violent negative-gee maneuver that would be needed to separate from it if you were to use Shuttle-style carriage on top of the existing 747 fuselage. (When the 747 was used for Enterprise's drop flights in the Approach and Landing Test series, even with the lift of the Shuttle's wings, the 747 had to make a zero-gee pushover to separate from Enterprise, due to the Shuttle's poor glide ratio; with an essentially wingless upper-stage booster, you'd need to make it even more aggressive, and negative gees are hard on both pilots and airframes.)

Really, if you want a fully reusable first stage, that's the simplest way to do it--use a large airplane for the "initial loft" up to about 15-17km and 250-300 m/s horizontal velocity, then drop the rest of the booster from it and have it fire once clear; the airplane then flies back to base. This has a long and proud tradition, from the early X-planes (X-1 and variants, X-2, X-15, from B-29s, B-50s, and B-52s) to today's Pegasus/Pegasus XL (from B-52s and L1011s) and Rutan's SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo (from the White Knight series motherships). Indeed, the USAF even tested the capability of launching ICBMs that way once in the mid-1970s, in a capability demonstration where a Minuteman ICBM was rolled out of the rear cargo ramp of a C-141 in flight and then fired to fly a normal mission. (The idea there was that it would allow the Air Force to compete with the Navy for having a "survivable" rapid-response deterrent force, in that transports flying around the US with ICBMs on board, ready for in-flight launch, couldn't be pre-targeted by Soviet missiles, much like the Navy's ballistic missile submarines at sea...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, given the requirement, I suspect that Boeing would prefer to build a winged vehicle, since this is merely a first stage. In fact, I suspect that said winged vehicle will look suspiciously like it shares its wings and engines with the 747-8[...]

Part of the program requirement is hitting Mach 10, so a 747 isn't exactly going to cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...