Jump to content

SLS - Ares I diameter?


Frozen_Heart

Recommended Posts

So this is a pretty random question but I've been looking at both rockets recently and apparently the Ares-I upper stage and SLS Core stage are both the shuttle external tank? However comparing the Orion capsule to them shows that they are not even close in diameter?

I'm trying to build both on KSP both trying to lift the 3.75m SLS tank with one of the SLS boosters just didn't look right (let alone work) which just set me wondering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the political selling points of the Constellation program was that it was re-using shuttle hardware (it's a lot easier to get the goverment to fund something if they think they've already bought half of it - because otherwise they'll feel they're wasting their investment).

The initial design concept of the Ares I upper stage had some commonality with the External Tank - but had a much smaller diameter (which meant little of the tooling could be re-used). In any case the design evolved quite a long way away from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ares I used a 5 segment version of the Shuttle boosters with a different grain pattern as the first stage and therefore retained the 3.71m diameter. The upper stage was to have an 18 foot (~5.5m) diameter, slightly larger than the 5m diameter of the Orion capsule.

The Space Shuttle external tank had an 8.4 meter diameter, a number shared by the core stages of both the Ares V and SLS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuzzy Dunlop: Cheers. In the things I was reading about them it just stated that both used a modified shuttle external tank. I though Ares I looked too small for that.

ChirsP.Bacon: Wasn't Ares V a 10m tank? It was stated that it could lift 180 tons to LEO which is considerably more than the SLS is predicted to be able to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were a couple versions of the Ares V being thrown around until the cancellation of the program. There was a cost-saving version which ironically used five of the much more expensive SSME's and a stretched 8.4m shuttle external tank. The 188 ton lifter with Altair would've used the larger 10m tank (which would require more production retooling) with five or six of the Rocketdyne RS-68's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...