Jump to content

Over 100 MB difference between zip-file and installer?


Recommended Posts

Depending on the exact compression method used for the installer (my knowledge in that area is outdated, but I vaguely recall that many installers use Gzip or perhaps 7zip compression algorithms), the file sizes may vary greatly between a manually packaged archive and an installer archive created by a third-party utility. As an example, a brief Google search turned up this utility, which has some pretty impressive-looking compression ratios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a targeted compressor can indeed make some impressive optimizations over a default general purpose simply because it has knowledge of the domain, the windows installer could for example use a compressor geared towards .net dlls and .exe for those files (and package a decompresser to use while installing), and a general algorithm for other things (models and textures)

I can point to the pack200 scheme that can use knowledge of the java jar format to efficiently compress jars by (amongst others things) extracting the static string pool of each class into a communal pool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...