Jump to content

Wished I had tried Linux long ago.


nukeboyt

Recommended Posts

My QNIX 2560 x 1440 monitor quits working when I install the Nvidia drivers. I searched around and found some settings for the xorg.conf that allowed it to work. Life was good until I tried to add a second monitor with different resolution. I failed to make a copy of the xorg.conf file and ended up unable to boot to either monitor. I could have corrected it with my live usb-stick, but I decided to move on to Ubuntu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The adventure continues. After several missteps and newbie mistakes, Catalyst is working correctly and I have anti-aliasing in KSP. ('Cause the game really does look terrible without AA, more so than some other titles.) No tearing, but there is a strange kind of stutter-slowdown every couple of seconds; it's barely noticeable. So I've avoided whatever bugs make some ATI graphics cards unusable with Linux.

I decided to not even mess with getting the game to run in a different directory. Not for now, anyway.

Next step: get my two recording programs working. If I can run KSP, Dxtory and Audacity all at the same time with high quality... that's all I want out of Linux right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...using 'relatime' as a mount option.

Another one of those things I often forget to mention, as I've been setting up fstab by hand for as long as I can remember.

I actually use 'noatime' on drives I'm never going to want to audit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...there is a strange kind of stutter-slowdown every couple of seconds; it's barely noticeable.

Yeah, there is (with NVIDIA too, so it's not the GPU driver). I'm not sure what's causing it either - best guess so far is monos garbage collector. There's a better one in place in the current mainstream mono, but Unitys fork is a wee bit behind.

Enabling multithreading for the builtin GC improves matters, but it also introduces memory leaks :(

If anybody has other ideas I'm all ears, 'tis fairly annoying.

AMD needs some serious poking regarding the driver bugs though, this has been going on far too long.

Edited by steve_v
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I failed to make a copy of the xorg.conf file and ended up unable to boot to either monitor.

You know you can fix Xorg issues from the console, right?

Boot /= GUI. Unlike Windows, the GUI is just another layer & the system is quite useable for most tasks without it. :D

In fact, you can have a graphical web-browser (wit a mouse even!), video playback, full multi-tasking etc. without even starting Xorg.

Edited by steve_v
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking of switching as well, at least on my laptop.

Back in high school, we used to work with an old version of Debian...I think, and it was less than stellar. But things seem to have improved :) I'm running OpenOffice, Gnuplot, GIMP and Inkscape anyway, so it shouldn't be much of a shock. Would you recommend Ubuntu or Mint?

Also, I heard bad things about Wine HQ, so it's probably good that the old thing can't run any games :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking of switching as well, at least on my laptop.

Back in high school, we used to work with an old version of Debian...I think, and it was less than stellar. But things seem to have improved :) I'm running OpenOffice, Gnuplot, GIMP and Inkscape anyway, so it shouldn't be much of a shock. Would you recommend Ubuntu or Mint?

Also, I heard bad things about Wine HQ, so it's probably good that the old thing can't run any games :D

Ubuntu is popular, but I like Mint better. If I'm recalling correctly, Mint is not a monolithic kernel (at least one of the releases anyway), so it's not such a hog on lightweight machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alrighty then. KSP and Audacity work perfectly well in Linux. SimpleScreenRecorder was a pain in the ass to set up, but now appears to be working. So that looks like everything I need. Next step: install my ten craptons of mods and start recording.

Just for giggles, you should burn and check out a live disk of AV Linux ... it's all that and more.

http://www.bandshed.net/AVLinux.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mint is not a monolithic kernel
Technically, all Linux kernels are 'monolithic' though the definition blurs a bit when you take into account loadable modules.

For a really lightweight system, nothing beats a hand-compiled kernel though.

I'm not sure what the minimum space requirement for a modern kernel is, but back in the 2.0.X days you could get a cli OS on a single 1.44MB floppy :D

It did involve rabbits though, and hats.

This, for example, is a fully functional router distro. I did a bit of hacking on it long ago, surprised it's still around TBH.

Edited by steve_v
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seen that one. A knockoff of Sco Unix?

IIRC it's more a play on 'free cisco'. It's pretty cool. I used to have a real beast of a 486 (120MHZ!) running this, lived in the basement doing ADSL routing / firewall duties plus some custom mods of my own to take voice messages with the fallback dialup modem, compress them to mp3 (SLOW) and send them out by email :)

Encoding time wasn't important, but with a heavily optimised mpg123 build it was _just_ fast enough for realtime playback - with ~85% CPU usage.

Finding software to deal with the voice functions of the modem & convert its unusual recording format was... interesting. Much digging through ancient FTP sites ;)

The DXL4 CPU was also the first I encountered that had a fan, one day it fell off... and nothing happened :)

Edited by steve_v
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot of people using Ubuntu, which is a great starting distro (just like Linux Mint)

Xubuntu would be a lightweight version of Ubuntu. If you want lighter then you could try Sparky Linux.

If you want lighter still then Crunch Bang Linux might be the fastest under the debian forks.

Personally I like Arch Linux, it puts you in control and is a pretty fast distro.

Technically, all Linux kernels are 'monolithic' though the definition blurs a bit when you take into account loadable modules.

For a really lightweight system, nothing beats a hand-compiled kernel though.

I'm not sure what the minimum space requirement for a modern kernel is, but back in the 2.0.X days you could get a cli OS on a single 1.44MB floppy :D

It did involve rabbits though, and hats.

This, for example, is a fully functional router distro. I did a bit of hacking on it long ago, surprised it's still around TBH.

Compiling your own kernel doesn't have any noticeable speed effect, it's from a time where every MHz mattered.

The only reason an end user would need to compile a custom kernel is when working with limited space or special hardware.

To increase your computer's performance you should consider using a lightweight GUI(like Xfce) and lightweight apps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...