Jump to content

Staging an action groups improvements(?)


Recommended Posts

The title says pretty much everything about this suggestion. This would be helpful to deal with attached sub assemblies that don't depend of the main staging to be used, but are attached to decouplers, for example. If you have a big vessel with a lot of stages, it becomes pretty hard to find out where your stage that shouldn't be activated is and increases the risk of you misplacing it on the order. Once you remove them from action groups, they return to the staging column.

Another nice thing would be to have command order priority for action groups, much like staging. You can decide in which order things get done by creating groups for different actions. This would give an easier implementation to the prior suggestion, since you could just set the entire staging sequence as an action group of the 'Stage' category, pretty much like landing gear and lights get automatically assigned to their respective groups in the Action Groups tab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...