Jump to content

KSP .90 Spaceplane wing comparo


GoSlash27

Recommended Posts

All,

I figured I'd post this here before the next update comes along.

This is a direct comparison of drag and mass for a fixed amount of lift for each wing surface type.

KSP .90 Wing type comparison

[TABLE=class: cms_table, width: 500]

[TR]

[TD]Type[/TD]

[TD]Cl[/TD]

[TD]Cd[/TD]

[TD]Mass[/TD]

[TD]N@Cl=10[/TD]

[TD]Mtotal[/TD]

[TD]Dtotal[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Swept[/TD]

[TD]1.6[/TD]

[TD].6[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]6.25[/TD]

[TD].31[/TD]

[TD].0641[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Conn A[/TD]

[TD]2[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].1[/TD]

[TD]5[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0855[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Conn B[/TD]

[TD]2[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].1[/TD]

[TD]5[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0855[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Conn C[/TD]

[TD]1[/TD]

[TD].25[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]10[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0428[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Conn D[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].12[/TD]

[TD].025[/TD]

[TD]20[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0205

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Conn E[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].12[/TD]

[TD].025[/TD]

[TD]20[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0205[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Delta[/TD]

[TD]2[/TD]

[TD].6[/TD]

[TD].1[/TD]

[TD]5[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].1026[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Sml Delta[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].1[/TD]

[TD].025[/TD]

[TD]20[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0171

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Strake[/TD]

[TD].75[/TD]

[TD].2[/TD]

[TD].025[/TD]

[TD]13.3[/TD]

[TD].33[/TD]

[TD].0228[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Struct A[/TD]

[TD]1[/TD]

[TD].3[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]10[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0513[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Struct B[/TD]

[TD]1[/TD]

[TD].3[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]10[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0513[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Struct C[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].15[/TD]

[TD].025[/TD]

[TD]20[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0257[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Struct D[/TD]

[TD].25[/TD]

[TD].08[/TD]

[TD].012[/TD]

[TD]40[/TD]

[TD].48[/TD]

[TD].0131[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Swept A[/TD]

[TD]1[/TD]

[TD].3[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]10[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0513[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Swept B[/TD]

[TD]1[/TD]

[TD].3[/TD]

[TD].05[/TD]

[TD]10[/TD]

[TD].5[/TD]

[TD].0513

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

So what I've done here is assumed the normal rule of thumb: 10x lift coefficient for each 10 tonnes of spaceplane. I've used enough of each wing type to achieve that goal.

Then I assumed that they were in their most efficient angle of attack and looked at how much mass and drag they represented.

The drag numbers are dimensionsless, and therefore do not take into account velocity or air pressure, but they are directly comparable to each other in any given circumstance.

Now... for a 10 tonne spaceplane, a difference of a couple hundred kg doesn't matter much. But the drag is very important.

As we climb over the 25-32km "hump", our engine thrust begins to reduce, and we are looking at our thrust to drag to keep us accelerating. Our 10 tonne spaceplane will generate 2 dimensionless "units" of drag in this regime, so it's vital that we don't add more drag than we have to.

After that, it's just a matter of t/w to get us to orbit and circularized.

I recommend that you use low drag and low mass wings whenever you can. I also recommend that you use the *proper amount* of wings whenever you can.

Best,

-Slashy

Edited by GoSlash27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...