The thinner the better!

[Astrofox]

So, I decided to create a challenge, specifically made for thinner rockets.

Rules:

You may use Mechjeb, Procedural Parts/Fairings, FASA, and stock KSP.

You must include download, but you have the option of posting a picture of the craft.

YOU MAY NOT MODIFY THE PARTS to achieve the "cheaper than 3000 funds" part of the challenge point system!

There may be structural pieces that extend outward as long as they help to enhance the stability of the craft.

You may use part clipping for the craft, but you may only do it if you are attaching batteries or attaching engines radially, but other than that, nothing else

Points:

100: complete challenge

200: complete challenge using RSS

35: use 1.25 meter parts (launcher, not payload)

40: use 1.25 - 0.625 meter parts

50: use only 0.625 meter parts

500: use only 3000 funds for the launch vehicle and payload

60: Use only stock parts

Here is my entry: Tinylaunch Mk1

Pics you may ask? well: PICTURE (sorry I had to make it a download, but I will find a way)

So, do you accept the challenge, or not? (may post challenge accepted meme) After all, you can go ANYWHERE, that is, as long as you make it into orbit safely.

Edited February 1, 2015 by Astrofox

[FleshJeb]

Is there a destination? Or do we simply construct?

[Foxster]

Is there a destination? Or do we simply construct?

I think there ought to be some aim of the craft. Orbit?

[Astrofox]

Anywhere you wish!

[sdj64]

Sooo... putting a QBE on the ground in RSS nets me full points? Since there's no destination specified...

I suppose if "has to go somewhere" is a requirement, add an Oscar B fuel tank and a 48-7s. It makes it off the launchpad. With a parachute on top it might even survive its flight.

Seriously, consider making "at least to Low Kerbin Orbit" a requirement.

[problemecium]

actually it'd be even thinner if we just put a sepratron on it. In fact, we could just have a stack separator launch a sepratron on its own and have an absurd 0.05 meter diameter entry.