Jump to content

JEF_300

Members
  • Content Count

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

About JEF_300

  • Rank
    Rocketeer

Profile Information

  • Interests
    The rather obscure game Kerbal Space Program

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It does have to be capitalized, but yep, that was it. Simply added ".V" to the filename, and it's working great now. Thanks!
  2. Just wanted to bump this, since I'm having the same problem. I can load the texture onto the default suit, but if I switch to the Vintage suit, it doesn't let me push the arrows.
  3. Thanks @OHara, the collider mod was really helpful. It appears that the fairing collider invisibly extends over the opening when the craft is re-loaded. It's perfectly fine for the whole launch, but when I rendezvous with it, it has to be re-loaded, and so when I try to dock I end up bouncing against the collider. Edit: I have found a solution that seems to be working. On my original design, I attached the fairing as close to the end of the structural tube as I could, for aesthetic reasons. When I edited the hanger to have the fairing attach in the middle of the tube, the fairing stopped
  4. Thanks @The Dunatian, that thread does seem to be about the same issue. The conclusion that thread came to was that it was impossible, due to the natural limitations of the stock fairing system, which I would agree with... if I hadn't already successfully tested it. Actually, I've successfully tested it several times over the past day, and with some variations. I've launched a Gemini on the pad and docked it to the test hangar, so being launched as separate craft isn't an issue. I decoupled a nosecone off the front of the hangar, as I did on the version I launched, and I was still able t
  5. So I had an idea awhile ago to create mini-hangers on my station for Gemini capsules. The idea is that you basically have a tube the width of the back of the Gemini service module. When the Gemini docks, back of the tube is "sealed" by the back of the spacecraft itself. Images of Test I tried this once before we had structural tubes using a decoupler to make the mouth of the hangar, but the capsule kept bouncing off an invisible wall in the middle of the decoupler. That's why I tested this version, which uses a 2.5 m structural tube, in hacked gravity on the runway. As you can see,
  6. Here's the log: [KSPUpgradePipeline]: Neu Glenn S3 (1.3.0) is up to date. (Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 42) ADDON BINDER: Cannot resolve assembly: TestFlightCore, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null (Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 42) ADDON BINDER: Cannot resolve assembly: TestFlightCore, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null (Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/
  7. @HarvesteR, Thank you for creating my favorite game
  8. So, just a quick update, I put the save I was using in a version of the 1.1 prerelease that promptly broke, so I won't have this out until 1.1 proper releases On a brighter note, Jet engine horizontal landing test: http://m.imgur.com/a/gdlUJ
  9. Actually, they built the infrastructure at Vandenburg, as I recall. I mean, they must of, because the first launch from Vandenburg was scheduled for later in 1986 or 1987, but then Challenger
  10. So, the last post here was made 2 years ago... Making a submission anyway! I've got just the thing in mind...
  11. Looks like I lied about 24 hours, and now it's the Monday so... I SHOULD have something in "a few days", whatever that ends up meaning There, a more honest answer
  12. This thread has been running since 2012? And I didn't know it existed? Huh. Ill have an entry here within 24 hours
×
×
  • Create New...