Urses

This one may be helpfull as well and for ksp 1.x.x. Marcus play heavy moded installs and use KOS but the beginner guides and tipps for early carrier stages are good. Try out... and best advice look where your priorities are. Set you one target for first time like cheapest lifter, biggest payload in one start, most contracts in one mission and try to get better for this one prime target. If you try to many aspects at one time you will only confuse your self.

You are right but in this example 84% for seconds don't do a big change but like said by him self he stays at 10 km till ge reaches orbital velocity. And if he follows Scotts example, he used up 1/5 more of fuel at this moment as Scott and changes many other things, like not to burn on Ap/Pe and so on. Best is his comment "i found another point for planning maneuver at 45°, but is this the fuel efficientest point? And as we see by his own comment it is not. The problemm is he runs of fuel. And if i try Scotts flying routine with actual mechaniks i mostly have enough fuel for 2-3 biom hops additionaly? The only thing i am wondering is, had he disabled heat gauge or scaled it down? Because a speedrun between 10 and 20 km gives mostly beautiful fireflies...

The problem is your plot predicts a situation where you burn full Dv at maneuverpoint in one moment. This is far away from reality. Your way to get right times is plot your maneuver till you have a Dv change. After this you fire your engines at full trust for shortest time and computer calculates a burntime. Here you get this number and as rule of tumb beginn your burn at T - burntime/2 it is not physicaly absolut perfect, but you get as near as possible to your planned trajectory without a call by NASA or Rosskom Funny Kabooms Urses

Werner: My beloved friends! Crowd: (- , - ) Werner: I have to announce a great step for Kerbalkind! Crowd : (o _ o) Werner: But we need a Volunteer! Crowd: ( o _ O)

Welcome to the forums. Bewing answered some of your questions. But one thing has catched my eye. Yor turn to 90° at 10 km... At 10 km your engine ISP is realy bad and this means you need much more fuel to get the same velocity addition as in much thinner air layers. Additionaly in lower air layers the drag aspect is way higher as in upper layers, you feed your fuel away to fight the drag and at lower efficiency. As example this is one of the aspects why a airplane is slick and a spaceship in vacuum will fly as can. And maneuvernodes ploting gives you the ability to hit a target every where but your target is not only the bullseye but a economical one. And pay attention to Scotts videos his beginner guides where made as KSP did not know about atmosphere drag or reentry heat

Don't let her make a fool from you! Only straight bananas are the way for rellay! Carrots get you only direct link. And Potatos are only for EC storage buz red? Are they nuclear? Looks like you need sometging for cooling.... some avocados? But i would look in DNS settings... maybe some modes have changed them?

We can go one step farther and misuse the abilitys given us woth actual fairings and use the interstages as structural Elements. The satelite core can be build on the fairing platform and all big elemenets like the antenas go in the interstages without decouplers as part of the structure. This way we have a slick strukture and linear and dont have any radii changes. And for Slashys idea for a pure monoprop design. One of my beloved landers for small moons is a landable rover build of scince parts and have only RCS as engine for landings and to have stability on the ground. 2 command seats+sience container as option with own RCS and monotank with docking port and stackseparator to the main roverbody with science parts and you have a manned biomehopper with ability to gatger all science, reset all experiments and you have after personal recovery a perm station/rover for later missions. Switch the separator for a docking port and you can reuse this sweet little beast over and over again. That is the part of KSP that will hold us in game.... you can try everething out and realy cant say it is impossible till no one trys it!

I agree with you Slashy. As i know in terms "most payload for lowest invest".... you need only to look in the challenges you are on the top places. The only thing where i would complain... KSP kills "debris", this way it prevents us to build "best" designs or follow other philosophies as "what i stage have to be cheap because it is scraped". Other hand it would be plausible to build a SRB assisted lifter to bring a payload on a X-50 orbit where the upperstage circulacise on its own on Ap and the lifter comes back through aerobrake and shutes as near as possible at KSC. I did this but i am not realy good pilot and landed over all of Kerbin.I am actualy on mode supported missuse. I build SSTO lifters, catch them up in Orbit with a tug and drain the fuel and disassemble them for materials needed for Stations.

If i have to be honest, i did build thuch rockets by my self... but if they are like here with first stage for almost orbit i would go a step farther and add the fairing below the first decoupler and cover the complete upperstage inside. It would be a little higher in buck factor but i evade the radius changes this way and have a slick design... but its only me. And as said as long you reach your mission parameters ... you win

@Galileo As we live in a multiversum Kerbals are Gaelan version of Fremen maybe? Gaelans with realy blue eyes?

Back in my days you have to meet with people face to face to play games and not stare in a screen....

@JadeOfMaar i think you have a install like mine... and as i red Worm Essence.... the only thing i though was Ressource Lodes....coincidence? And as a Easteregg a giant "Al Shalud" Corpse somewhere as a trail it may be the Spice planet.... Have we to wring out our Kerbals for Water there too?....

The rule of tumb may be the modders Statement: "If you have a CKAN problem ask there i don't use/support them!" You find mostly a direkt links to CKAN in the OP's of modes where supporr runs smooth if there is nothing like it you will be better by using miniAVAC and install manualy.

In a planetsystem far far away...... GPP prevents me vorever to play stock.....

@Der Anfang welcome back and have a great time again. And i don't think we are beautiful, we are such nerds and stay so far from mainstream that our normal behavior looks like perfectly sozialised, but it is only through pure misunderstandig of concept of rudnes. We try to get all sorts of sources to clarify "you are misleaded"... Like here.... Funny Kabooms Urses

"Spice....Dune....the World where Spice come from...who reigns the Dune whom reigns the Spice.... and thus the universe...." And again a formidable Idea by Deep Sky Agencie

@Azimech Condolence brother. Take time to think about what it changes in yoir life and how to get with it. But the best memory for gone parents are we self. As long we remember them they stand by our side.

Hello at all. I might be dumb but need some support of how to use the ChemCam. I tryed to place her in many various positions as in VAB/SPH as through help of KAS in many various positions insitu but neverless i see the laser reacht the ground and as i try to target variable undergrounds, buildings or scatterer objects (stones, trees and on) i only get the "no objects in range"-message. Do i miss something here. KSP 1.3.1 with latest release of this mode through GitHub. The telescopes works flawlessly by the way. And @JPLRepo the combination of TST and RB in game adds a tealy great depth to the game. Thanks for your work!

This means only that life based on carbonate cicle is more Impossible as otherway. But what about silicium based? The same molecules are possible by substituting carbon with silicium and will suppport the same processes as carbon like, but need much higher energy levels to do so? We think to strong carboncentered in a multiversum defined (at the moment) enviroment. We only define life as we know it and every other lifeform may it be slower or faster as our own, we don't recognaise as such? Like what we name "ghosts" are beeings on higher energy levels maybe? And they are wondering why is there a planet populated with billions of statues whom slowly changes their positions through many of decades?....

By this meanings we have to define a habitable planet by injection prinzip. You shot some sort of life seed in it and the planet can selfsuficient forgone in this way to generate a biosphere, i don't speak of terraforming but if as example a contaminated sonde land there the spores may evolve a form to sustain on the "infected" body. On otherr hand you have the ability to artificaly inhabitate a body but need a min. state of technology to install and provide the habitable status. But you need to become a status of selfsustainable operability or it is only a landed space ship and not a habitat. This way Mars may become habitable for some bakterias with high radiation withstand ability and very low dense armospherical enviroment. But Moon or asteroids or planets around PC can be only "artifical habitable". I know of presence of spores that can sustain vakuum exposation but they "sleep" untill they come in a habitable enviroment (that is why life infection is possible).

As i remember your forworks you had nice FedEx Examples. And to hold on your modularity, what about a FedEx like mainbody with Container slots on the left and right side? With ability to dock modules to them too? You can go as player for a full automated cargotrawler or give up on some cargo modules to support crew and passengers? If doen by you i think it will be my next musthave

Prise to whom the prises belongs But your workaround "from top off your head" looks and feels right. And the best part is, as you notified "Tweak me to your liking"!

"SPACEBALLS" "Ridiculous Speed"-Button?

@Streetwind Typos are like a herd of animals, if one goes loose the others will follow May i ask for a favor? Can you please add your small handy "Smoke Generator" to @Alshain 's MM-Patch tread additionaly? Many Thanks before hands! Funny Kabooms Urses

Chainbreacker! Maybe @JadeOfMaar