Duck McFuddle
-
Posts
146 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Duck McFuddle
-
-
Ok, just realized this section is actually for KSP2. My bad, it’s been a while since I used these forums, I guess I just clicked the first “mission reports” I saw. Could a mod move this over? Or should I copy it and just delete this one? Thanks
-
Completing this challenge has been a dream of mine since I started playing KSP back in ~2018. I've played KSP on and off since then, and amassed several hundred hours of playtime, but today I finally finished my first ever Jool 5 Mission. One launch, no mining, no refueling, completely vanilla! And to be clear, no cheats or anything either. I'm sure posts exactly like this are made every day here, but I am really proud of this accomplishment, so I'd like to make my own going in-depth on the whole mission.
I started thinking about doing this mission about a week ago. I had been coming back to the game and doing some things I'd never done before, like doing return missions to Tylo and Eeloo. At the time, my plan was really just to do a return mission to each celestial body, so I've truly explored the whole system. However, after visiting Pol and Bop, I started pondering the feasibility of a Jool 5 mission. I have distinct memories of fantasizing about doing the challenge years and years ago, and I even have the save files for one of those attempts. Although, I warn you, the lander designs are pretty... unconventional. This is a Tylo lander, apparently.
Spoiler
Anyway, I'm pretty sure my biggest KSP achievement back then was stranding a lander on Duna, so needless to say I was not exactly equipped to do a Jool 5 mission. Over the years since then, however, I've played KSP periodically, getting better and better each time I come back. And as I said, this time I felt ready to go for it, so I did!
When designing the craft, I took quite a lot of inspiration from Matt Lowne's Jool 5 video. This is most obvious in the Laythe spaceplane, because I am terrible at making SSTOs. However, I still made the whole craft myself from scratch without downloading anything or whatever. Speaking of the Laythe spaceplane, this was by far the hardest thing for me. I tested this thing relentlessly, spending hours descending and ascending over and over again in a testing save file. It took several days and many, many iterations of the plane to get something that could a) land on Laythe, and b) limp back into orbit again. Even in the final version, it barely could make it to orbit and I actually had to fly the mothership down a bit to pick it up. I think I had too much liquid fuel, but I'm not totally sure.
The other lander to design would be for all the other moons, most notably Tylo. This was a piece of cake compared to the Laythe lander. I had already done a Tylo return without refueling, so I knew how to make it, and I didn't find it too difficult since I could use a lot of the same design elements (though I could only fit 4 side boosters instead of my previous 6). Nevertheless, I only had to make a couple changes while testing, and soon it was ready to go. After discarding the 4 side boosters via asparagus staging, the lander would be ready for use on the other vacuum moons (Vall, Pol and Bop).
My first attempt ran into some issues with parts blocking NERV thrust, but after getting that sorted, I was ready to go. However, the second attempt didn't get too far either. I was struggling a lot with getting into orbit around Laythe, since I wanted to be as efficient as possible and was trying to aerobrake a little. However, my craft was not set up for that at all, so I could barely enter the atmosphere, and my encounter was pretty bad too so I was using a ton of DeltaV to circularize. I eventually got there, but I was in a retrograde orbit, and still struggling to get my plane to orbit after landing. I only had about 4.6k DeltaV parked in Laythe orbit (even without the plane) and I didn't really trust myself to finish the journey with such limited fuel. So, I decided to start over, making some changes to the craft to allow for easy aerobraking.
Finally, we are at the important part of this post, the actual final mission. I launched 3 days ago, and this is what the craft looked like, rocket and mothership. In the VAB, the whole thing weighed in at 1300 tons, with 262 parts.
Spoiler
The rocket is pretty huge overkill, but I didn't feel like having to do a super efficient Kerbin launch, so I left it. In fact, almost all of the second stage is still full of fuel when we reach LKO, so I could use it as some nice high-TWR thrust for our first escape burn. As usual, I split the Jool transfer into a bunch of burns to be more efficient (and because the mothership has a TWR of 0.20). I wanted a nice Tylo gravity assist to save DeltaV, and they aren't super hard to get. However, the one I got here was amazing (by my standards at least), and with only a small adjustment it gave me a nice and curved Laythe encounter for an easy aerobrake.
Spoiler
I had the big inflatable heat shields at either end of the craft to aerobrake with. At first I had some flipping issues, but I got some advice from Reddit, and moved most of the mass to the front along with putting some wings on the back end. This fixed the issue for me. The aerobrake went smoothly, and I got lucky again here, because my first random guess at an altitude gave me a nearly perfect circular orbit with an Apoapsis of around 56 km (I think).
Spoiler
Now that I was here, I could continue with the hauntingly familiar task of landing and returning from Laythe. I had already developed a strategy to land on the correct land mass (be 1/4 of the planet back from where you want to land, burn down until your orbit line is as far ahead of that island as the distance between the two big equatorial islands, and go into the atmosphere at about 30 degrees with the plane). It's kind of a ridiculous method but it worked consistently for me. Anyway, I followed those directions and after a few quickloads made my first landing of the trip.
Spoiler
Now it was time to take off, which would prove to be much more difficult than the already challenging landing. I basically just did trial and error until I could barely get above the atmosphere and still be orbiting. The mothership was also in a somewhat inclined orbit, so I had to try and match that on the ascent. Eventually I got it, and we could collect all the science and move on to the next moon: Tylo.
Spoiler
After collecting the science, I detached the section of the ship that carried the plane, as well as the plane itself. Then it was time to make the journey over to Jool's largest moon. As expected, Tylo was pretty straightforward compared to Laythe - however, there were a few issues I ran into.
One of them you may be able to spot from the picture of the mothership earlier in this post. I moved a few engines up towards the front in order to prevent flipping while aerobraking, and made a very stupid mistake. Try and spot it.
The nuclear engines block the Tylo lander from getting out of its compartment! This was such a moronic error, and I was afraid I would have to start all over again. However! Bill Kerman was able to save the day, by using his engineer construction skills to move the mothership's docking port out of the way. This allowed the now undocked lander to just barely squeeze out. I later moved the docking port around to the front of the ship (since I had jettisoned the heat shield that used to be there). After that, the Tylo landing went pretty smoothly.
Spoiler
I'd like to mention that I think in the context of a Jool 5 mission, I think Laythe is way, way harder of a component than Tylo is. At least for me. I've heard a lot of people say Tylo is the most difficult moon, and maybe that's true as just a normal return mission, but within a Jool 5 mission Laythe is infinite more challenging. Both in designing a lander that works well for it, fitting it into the mothership, and then actually flying it down and back up again.
Anyway, it was time for the Tylo ascent. Something weird happened here, and I'm not sure why - the craft just kept trying to tip over and fight my control. I had to use a lot of RCS throughout the whole ascent, which wasn't great, because I realized I didn't pack any extra monopropellant on the mothership besides the default stuff in the capsule. I would have to be more sparing with it from now on. Now that we had finished with the two hardest moons, I redocked with the mothership and headed over to Vall.
Spoiler
After arriving at Vall, I turned the thrust limiter on my lander's aerospike engine down to 20 and left it like that for the rest of the mission. It seemed to mostly fix the weird flipping thing, and would just be more convenient on lower gravity bodies anyway.
The Vall landing was pretty standard, although I forgot to refuel one of the lander's fuel tanks which made the ascent way closer than it needed to be. I think I had to pick the lander up with the mothership again. I've always really liked Vall, I think it's a nice place to visit and isn't ridiculously challenging.
Spoiler
Now we only have the two outermost moons left, Pol and Bop. I chose to do them in that order because I figured it would be a bit more efficient - because their orbits are inclined, I could just do one adjustment to match Pol and then another adjustment in the same direction to match Bop. This would prevent me from having to undo/go backwards on my Bop adjustment to match Pol.
Getting out to Pol was more trial and error, but I got pretty lucky and found a nice encounter fairly quickly. Pol is quite small, so the landing wasn't too hard, although I kept bouncing and tipping over when touching down. This was an issue on Bop too. I like visiting Pol a lot as well, it's got a cool design and the gnome hats are fun.
Spoiler
So now it was time for the final landing, Bop. It's in a very inclined orbit, but I had quite a large excess of DeltaV by this point, so I didn't need to be too efficient about it. Just like Pol, it's nice and small, so the landing was easy and DeltaV wasn't an issue.
Spoiler
And with that, we've landed on every moon in the Joolian system! I took some science from orbit around Jool since I realized I'd forgotten to do that earlier, and then it was time to do my burn back to Kerbin. I didn't need to bother getting into orbit or anything, since my command pod has a heat shield. I entered the atmosphere at nearly 5000 m/s, but heat shields are insanely powerful, so it was totally fine. Finally I splashed down in the ocean on Kerbin, home at last after a lengthy 7 years and 100 days!
Spoiler
Our final science gathered was almost 16,000! I only did science landed and in low orbit (or high orbit in the case of Jool), so I could have gotten much more. However, I didn't feel like doing science constantly, and I already cheat unlocked the whole tech tree before starting lol (don't worry, I've unlocked the tree legit before).
And that's the whole mission! I'm so happy to have done this, and I found it a really fun challenge. I hope this post can encourage people to do this themselves, if anyone wants advice or has questions I'd be happy to help any way I can (I'm not really a KSP super-expert though).
Congratulations and thanks if you read this whole thing, and good luck on your own missions!
-
I've never thought of this before, but when I saw your post it actually does seem like a good addition to the game that would probably get good useage. I've always had issues with drag, so a safe way to test that would be incredible.
-
I've done something like this before with cheats, it was pretty fun but my part temperature was through the roof before I even got close. Without cheats I dkbt think this is even close to possible without just a ridiculous amount of heat shields. And even if you do get close, you'll explode anyway just like with Jool. This is still a fun challenge, though, if you want to see how close you can get.
-
I've tried a similar thing, only my problem was not having a long enough space to drive down. I would have to transport my craft down to one of Kerbin's poles and that seems like a lot of work.
-
I made a thread similar to this one a little while back, many of the answers there still apply. You can find that old thread here.
-
When have you totally destroyed whatever semblance of KSP you had, leading to the most impressive glitches you've ever seen?
Like that one time I somehow messed up changing the gravity setting and accidentally transformed Kerbin into a black and white terrifying mess of a planet, complete with partly invisible Kerbals. Still not sure how that one happened.
-
I'm picturing it as everything KSP1 lacks - smoother, less bugs, more planets, interstellar travel, better colonies, multiplayer - pretty much every thread from suggestions and development from the past year. From what we've seen in the trailers, it does pretty much seem like all the suggestions for KSP1 mashed into a brand new, more polished game.
-
Must have missed that... my apologies.
-
So it seems clear in the KSP2 trailer that colonization on a large scale will be possible - building up not only outposts but even cities over time. What is less clear is how these mechanics will work on such big projects. Will I have to slowly cart out every little piece of my colony to another star system? Because that would not only be tedious but also prevent many players from seriously making a colony without using cheats. Perhaps a portable VAB? But with a feature like that, the game would instantly become way too easy to build things with, making space stations instantaneous. Colonizing has always been an interesting part of the game for me and I really hope it can be done right if it is to factor into KSP2.
How would you like colonization to be done? What would you consider to be "too easy" or "too hard"? How big should colonies get in a game like KSP or KSP2?
-
I love surface bases, so having yet another thing to make them more interesting and expansive.
-
As we all know KSP2 is coming out soon. Judging by the trailer, it aims to be a super enhanced KSP with everything the current game lacks. However, I do have one concern - and that is of how the current KSP will be updated alongside KSP2. If KSP2 has a feature, will that feature eventually be added into KSP1? Or will KSP1 just stop being updated? I'm sure many people might not buy KSP2 simply because of cost, but does that mean that they can't enjoy updates anymore?
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if KSP1 needs a feature, but KSP2 already has that feature, does KSP1 get it as well? I'm not an expert in game development so I might be missing something obvious, but it seems as though KSP1 runs the risk of simply evolving into KSP2 or else getting tons of weird, unneeded features that were only added because KSP2 doesn't have them.
Maybe im overthinking this, but honestly I'm a bit confused by how two games so similar run alongside each other from the same developers.
-
I've already made a thread about this:
So yes, you have my vote. That would be awesome. But many of the problems mentioned in my thread still apply - it would be a lot of effort on Squad's part. I wouldn't count on it, but who knows? Maybe one day this actually will be implemented. I'd love to move my Kerbals around with tunnels and walkways instead of having to send them out into space and awkwardly shift them around. It would make space stations a thousand time more interesting a thousand times more interesting as well. The possibilities are endless.
-
Most of the suggestions and development threads are about big changes - but how about the little ones? Post here about little things you want fixed/changed (bugs that annoy you, a part of the game that feels a little empty, etc.)
-
More life on Kerbin would be great - and I cannot tell you how ridiculously happy I would be if they added newscasts and other "countries" - and the idea of that if you landed a Kerbal in a bad region you might have to pay a fine to get them out. This would prevent just plopping a capsule down wherever, and make you have to think more about your trajectory to be safe (just like what NASA would have to do back in the Cold War - landing some astronauts in the middle of the USSR might be a bad idea) Also, crashing rockets into cities might get you a bad rep on the news, leading to less contracts and of course lowered reputation points. However, completing missions would get you great news coverage and maybe even special grants from the Kerbal gouvernement. I'm probably taking this idea little too far but it's better to give too much than too little I guess.
-
I'm pretty sure that at some point I made a thread for both IVA activity and submarines, so those are both a yes from me. I feel as though we already got stuff for an interplanetary based module overhaul with breaking ground and it's long term science experiments. Survivability I just find too difficult, as it just adds one more thing to forget when you are building a rocket. I'd love to have space stationa become useful, I love building them and more to do would be great. There was a great mod for this that I had once, but the name escapes me. A science overhaul would kind of be pointless, since I think we have a good enough science system already and with breaking ground it got even better. I don't want interstellar travel, mostly because it would cause lag and it having it be randomly generated would make it annoying if you saw somebody else with a star system you wanted but since it's random you won't ever get it. Maybe there could be a sort of "seed" that you could enter at the beginning and tell other people. Comets are just boring. Need I say more? Perhaps if there were some new science experiements made specially for comets it would intrigue me more. As for other countries, battling against an AI doesn't interest me that much, and it might be kind of boring sometimes. It could also get very buggy fast. Overall, if there were to be a new DLC I'd like it to be pretty minor, and I don't want anything that changes the style of KSP at all.
-
I agree with 1, but for Kevin it's a solid no for 1.1 and 2. 1.1 makes Eve way to easy - Eve has its own challenge that has everything to do with the atmosphere. I don't like 2 mainly because it eliminates KSP's lego-like feel. KSP forces you to be creative, and being able to instantly make something whatever size you want would hurt KSP's overall vibe. SimpleRockets2 is a very different game from KSP, one that makes perfect sense with this kind of a feature, since SimpleRockets2 is a variant of SimplePlanes (which uses procedural parts to great extent). These two games are very different from one another, which is why you can buy both and have unique experiences with each.
-
On 6/19/2019 at 1:15 PM, ILoveStars said:
I can never make mods work tho
Yeah I had a lot of trouble getting mods to work at first as well, and my wild adventures in the realm of KSP files ended more than once with me breaking the game. I eventually got some to work, but half the time they don’t seem to work right. Most of the time I just keep mods turned off, pretty much just because it’s too much work and I don’t find them that useful.
-
54 minutes ago, Jatwaa said:
All of this... Literally was already answered. Literally.
Whoops. I didn't read through all the answers (there are seven pages after all, and I'm lazy).
-
This won't happen. It never will. It's impossible.
I'll use an example from another post to explain.
Let's say I'm flying a jet plane and trying to land it on the runway, and my friend is over in a Kerbol orbit. My friend wants to time warp to an Eve encounter. I'm coming in towards the KSC when my friend warps. Suddenly, my game speeds up, and I explode into a fiery mess after smashing into the VAB. It just doesn't work out. There ware ways around this, but not without making it incredibly boring for one player waiting for their friend to finally land, or without screwing up orbits.
The second problem is reverting - if I crash my ship while my friend just landed on Minmus, then when I revert he will go back to wherever he was when I launched. Now he'll have to keep trying to land until I don't crash. See the issue?
The third problem is if you try to fix either of these problems, you destroy space-time and end up creating multiple timelines and teleportation and a huge array of bugs. It just doesn't work out. Squad has talked about this for a while and the fact that it hasn't happened makes me think it really isn't coming. People need to stop fantasizing about this - multiplayer in KSP is never going to happen unless Squad does some serious redesigns. I mean, who knows, but for now I think it isn't coming. So please stop making posts about this. Try searching for "multiplayer" in the search bar - over 6,000 results come up. That's about 5,990 too many. It's been discussed, so now all we have to do is wait for either Squad to say it's never going to happen, or for them to say it will.
-
I'm going to keep this simple:
I dislike this idea.
Career mode is hard enough already, and KSP has difficulty controls. I find it hard enough to manage part size with ships in a lower-size VAB, and even just getting to orbit with the limited resources entertains me. I don't want career mode to be the "hard" mode of KSP - I want it to be another way to play the game, one with fun things like contracts and money and reputation. It doesn't need to be harder because it's original purpose wasn't to be hard, just a more diverse playing experience where you have to manage more resources.
-
This has been suggested before, and the answer is always the same:
THERE'S A MOD FOR THAT
But, of course, if you don't want to have mods then it would be nice to have them stock. But having other star systems would make the loading time ridiculous, among other lag-related things. I honestly just don't think this is possible with KSP at the moment - so mods will have to do.
-
I've always wanted this, since I started playing KSP. Even just going to Jool can be boring because it takes several minutes. I have a mod for this, but like every gameplay-improving mod I would like it in stock KSP.
-
Of course! Air resistance will heat up your plane. Just like @GoatRider said, the SR-71 was actually designed with this in mind.
Jool 5 Complete! One launch, no mining or refueling!
in KSP1 Mission Reports
Posted
Thanks