Jump to content

Candlelight

Members
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Candlelight

  1. 5 hours ago, radonek said:

    I recently moved from much worse card (GTX275) to 970 and I can't tell any difference. Not in KSP that is :-)
     

    Woah dude, the 200 series! Altough it's like 7-8 years old by now, the higher end of the 200s still performs decently, like on a 750 Ti level.

  2. Well, KSP is mostly CPU-dependant, not so much GPU, and really likes that one core, so opting for Intel CPUs is probably the best.

    However, you will most likely only see the difference on the GPU side if you install a bunch of visual enchancement mods.Moving from the 750 Ti to the 970 is a huge leap, so you will most probably see a huge difference in performance with visual mods, if you have some installed that is.Otherwise, there will be some improvement in performance, but not by that much.

    However, the value of the 970 is decreasing drastically, so opting for something like AMDs RX 480 will be better: similar or better performance with a similar TDP for almost $50-$100 less!

  3. Being a simpleton as always.Just launched KerbSAT-1 and a small repair/maintenance orbiter shortly afterwards with Jeb in it.Forgot to add solar panels to the orbiter, now Jeb is hanging out with the probe waiting for rescue, spending his time talking to the probe.

    5d48kk.png

    BTW, the probe kind of looked like Juno, which urged me to spin it up, which i did in this pic.

×
×
  • Create New...