Jump to content

Diche Bach

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

308 Excellent


About Diche Bach

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Location
    Beyond the vast public, static, void . . .
  • Interests
    C++, game design, anthropology, history, military science, psychology, psycho-biology, epigenetics, mathematics, astronomy.

Recent Profile Visitors

2,461 profile views
  1. Would love to see your mod list!

    1. capi3101


      Sure thing. I'll let Add-On Version Checker do the work for me, so this list will include version numbers. Not all of these are up to date for 1.6.x, but as best I can tell they all still work properly.

      KSP: 1.6.1 (Win64) - Unity: 2017.1.3p1 - OS: Windows 10  (10.0.0) 64bit
      ClickThroughBlocker -
      KSP API Extensions /L -
      Toolbar - 1.7.18
      ToolbarControl -
      AtmosphereAutopilot - 1.5.12
      B9 Aerospace Procedural Parts - 0.50
      Community Category Kit - 4.1
      Community Resource Pack - 1.1
      Community Trait Icons - 1.0.2
      AGExt - (Action Groups Extended)
      Dynamic Deflection - 1.2.4
      EVAEnhancementsContinued -
      ExtraplanetaryLaunchpads - 6.4
      Ferram Aerospace Research -
      HullcamVDSContinued - 0.1.11
      Interstellar Fuel Switch -
      KAS - 1.1.6876.38030
      Kerbal Engineer Redux -
      Kerbal Joint Reinforcement /L -
      Kerbal Inventory System - 1.16.6876.37464
      KSP-AVC Plugin - (Add-On Version Checker)
      ModularFlightIntegrator - 1.2.6
      Docking Port Alignment Indicator - 6.8.3
      NRAP - 1.5.13
      PatchManager -
      Portrait Stats - 1.0.17
      Precise Node -
      Protractor Continued - 2.11
      RCS Build Aid -
      Ship Manifest - 5.2.1
      StageRecovery - 1.9.1
      Surface Mounted Lights - 1.12.7006.42726
      TAC Fuel Balancer - 2.20
      Trajectories - 2.2.1
      Kerbal Alarm Clock - 3.10
      TweakScale -
      USI Alcubierre Drive - 1.1
      EVAParachutesAndEjectionSeats - 0.1.16
      Waypoint Manager - 2.7.4
      WildBlueTools - 1.72.1
      Kerbal Actuators - 1.7.1
      Buffalo - 2.6.13
      Mark One Laboratory Extensions - 1.17.2
      Pathfinder - 1.32.4
      OSE Workshop - 1.3.1

      In my screenshots from today, the Auk XVI is using B9 Procedural Wings, the Docking Port Alignment Indicator is being displayed and the mass driver and SAFER reactors come from Buffalo. I think that House Harkonnen's drydock comes from Mark One Lab Extensions (that one may possibly also be Buffalo), and she has an Alcubierre Drive installed.

      The portable lab and Gemini parts docked up at Kerbinport in the first screenie are definitely from MOLE (Mark One Lab Extensions).

  2. I re-installed KSP today. Fired it up to insure it worked. Went to CurseForge. Downloaded Mechjeb; watched a video to remind me how mods in this game work. Extracted the MJ archive and plopped into the folder. Fired up KSP. Got an error about MJ not being properly installed. Realized it was the dreaded double-packaged problem that so often happens with 7zip. Grabbed the inner directory and moved it outside the outer directory, deleted the outer and fired up KSP again to success. Then, my modaholism kicked in and I began to download every mod I recognized and loved (from my previous instal
  3. For whom? Well, for me and people with tastes like mine, so perhaps several tens of millions of would-be consumers I suppose. Consider how many copies games like Civilization sell; that seems like a fair index of "for whom." How "much better?" Well, there is no accounting for tastes, but I think most developers would agree that selling 1 million copies > 100,000! And again: consider how many copies of games like Civilization sell. Rimworld is another point to consider; slightly different set of factors but also instructive. What stops ME from building a campaign generator? Well fo
  4. Life itself is, in some sense, a defiance of "physics and chemistry." What happens to a dead body? It decays. So why are none of us decaying yet? Because we are alive. Senescence itself is an adaptation, and it does not reflect, as some of you seem to think a simple manifestation of 'wear-and-tear' or 'expenditure of supplies.' It does involve trade-offs in somatic versus reproductive effort and various other forms of life-history allocation, and to be sure all of those relations (as well as the very existence of life itself) adhere strictly to the natural constraints of reality which are
  5. I think your definition of "hard sci fi" differs from the norm Sounds very nice, but I think you've actually evaded the question. I asked why senescence rates in eukaryotes vary between very brief time intervals and relatively much longer ones. You can refer to physics all you want, and it is undoubtedly true that whatever ultimate explanation to such a question is reached will be explicable in terms of physics. But you are NOT going to be able to arrive at that explanation with pure physics. You need the more inclusive level of scientific inquiry, commonly called biology, to get to yo
  6. That is a good find, I appreciate it. It makes the point I was attempting to argue, i.e., that hibernation, stasis or something along those lines is a plausible means for humans to undertake interstellar travel. Not yet a proven technology, and perhaps never actually achievable, but plausible, unlike say FTL which is implausible. That in my opinion is the key distinction between hard and soft science fiction; your distinction apparently being 'if it doesn't already exist then it is soft science fiction, if it already exists, but only in very limited form then it counts as hard science fic
  7. Lotta "ifs" but I suppose there is some slim chance Proxima isn't a scorched, airless rock. I suppose the whole color scheme for flora would be totally different given Proxima is shifted more to the infrared end of the spectrum? Seem to recall someone saying that an analog of chlorphyll in that context would need to be more toward the black end of the spectrum in order to be optimized the way our green chlorphyll is optimized for Sol.
  8. Why then do senescence rates in eukaryotes vary between mere weeks and literal centuries? The whole point of biology is to temporarily defy entropy. It may well be true that completely forgoing it is impossible, but no one has suggested that have they? Point is: sound biology doesn't defy physics or chemistry, but physics and chemistry cannot fully explain biology. The fact a bristlecone pine ages so much more slowly than a frog or a house cat can be reduced down to the level of chemistry and physics and what we would find at that level is: biological system "working around" the rules of
  9. Well, apparently it MIGHT have that 3/2 orbital synchrony and if it had a very high saline content oceans, then that combined with the 3/2 (264 Earth-hour long "day" and same length "night" and no appreciable seasons . . . don't think an axial tilt is viable with the 3/2?) means that some modeling suggests it could be "tropical" along the equator! ADDIT: also! Gotta have a VERY good magnetosphere which has been functioning reliably for its whole ~4 billion year lifetime protecting the planet from Proxima's radioactive tantrums!
  10. Agree. But you don't need to freeze a body to put a body in stasis! Medicine and physics say YES to putting people into various types of stasis routinely.
  11. I've been studying the broad interdisciplinary area of human biopsychology since the late 1970s. I've been studying computer science since early 2016. In my opinion, we are CENTURIES from having even the most basic necessary understandings of human psyches to be able to "upload" people. We are in contrast, already placing people (routinely) into a variety of altered states of metabolism and consciousness, as well as restoring normal states to people who have for reasons of disease or trauma been plunged into degenerative states (e.g., "death"). The problems of regulating metabolic st
  12. You should be respectful and restrained in your claims to only those you actually have reasonable knowledge basis to make, if you do not want the quality and veracity of your arguments to undergo attacks. You do not know what you are talking about and you are not okay with just admitting that and saying "Ah my bad. I didn't know about that."
  13. If you are not looking for a fight then why did you start one? Perhaps the fact English is not your first language is what accounts for your rudeness and lack of comprehension? Same with every technology that has ever gone from imagined to real . . . your efforts to stand firm with whatever position you've taken have the appearance of diminishing good will and increasing defensiveness from my standpoint. . . . what does this even mean? Are you suggesting to me that you are fully versed in the sciences of senescence and caloric restriction, else that you read that entir
  14. You are aware of what happens to frogs, bats, etc. when they hibernate? Your level of knowledge of biology is sufficient for you to conclude that those processes cannot be modeled for application in humans? LOL, slowing aging is no problemo! The fact that you obviously have zero knowledge of this well-established empirical generalization (which has existed for decades) and yet seem to feel that you are sufficiently well-informed to dismiss science fiction which would leverage these sorts of natural phenomena is what I find remarkable. Like I said: I always thought you were a pretty c
  15. And I said "Yeah, 'freezing and thawing a human body alive is not hard scifi'. So what?" Like I said, try to understand There are now several posts since your first one including some by me where I provide more detail. I'll leave it at that, except to repeat what I already said several posts back. Not necessary to achieve functional benefits of cryo-stasis (which in truth should be called "Cryo-Chemo Stasis" because most legit models involve perfusion of specific drugs if not artificial blood into the organism to mediate non-destructive effects of the cooling). https://
  • Create New...