CsendesMark

Thanks guys, I'm waiting for the connection. My client see no other peers so far!

Hello All. Where can I get this mod? Sadly seeing Kerbalstuff is closed, and I nobody seeding the torrent they put up Can you please help me out?

In my opinion, some kind of sensor would be great, to unlock, which would be the only predecessor for the "claaaaaw".

Exactly! That's what I missing from stock KSP a lot! There is no need to think, design, and carry out multiple missions to achieve a bigger goal, like in real world! I did not find those, before starting this one

Sounds like you working at EA... Awful Idea!

Yeah, the huge asteroids, which scale are more from several hundred meters to kilometres in size. But for even an "F" sized asteroid, ground based telescopes are not really an option.

+1 /why not?

Hey pal! I have a question, why do we "get" asteroids just out of the blue when we start up a new game in carrier mode? What I'm talking about? Well, in short now we get a bunch of asteroids around Kebrin, but would be more realistic/challenging, aaand also more fun, if you would need to place some device on a Kebrin orbiting satellite to actually spot those rocks. SQUAD might award us some extra science points for spotting those over time (constant slow but steady science income problem could be solved this way). Like WISE do in our world Give this thread a bump, if you like the idea! Also thanks for reading!

I understand that, in this case, I'm not complaining over the need of 64bit unity option either. But how old is that old, and does unity bother to have a newer version of PhysX implemented?

But doesen't PhysX supporting multi-threading? YES it IS! However my KSP uses only 1 core for sure, the other three core's potential aren't utilized at all! Why we don't have this option working? Please make it work! I really don't like when my part count "kills" my game, and playing with less than 25 FPS is less fun than playing with more than 25 FPS

Soon? Do you mean, They're already developing this? If yes, Cool!

Hello again! Is there a way to utilize more than one monitor? The second would be great for additional info windows about... EVERYTHING So, for example you could see all these windows, while you have the nice view of your vessel and stuffz

Sorry, I think I wasn't really clear, my problem is not with the one-time waiting to start the game, I talking about the actual gameplay, when I having multiple ships and/or high part count and a very low framerate.

And does Squad working on that matter? Because my i7 3820 is just getting wasted, with about total 26~27% CPU load during game

Awesome idea! I buyin' it!

I was just actually did that on Wasmic's advice! KSPX and KW Rocketry + FAR + fairing mods aaand Remote tech aaaaaand scansat! (KPS now uses around 3,2 GB od RAM, so I close to the 32bit limits ) They have the lego parts wich I been looking for So I started a new, (my first) sandbox game to re-learn the rules, and it's pretty cool so far!

Will do! Also planning to use the four addon which was listed at the don't ask thread. But I'm kind of new for KSP Started with 0.23, and I wanted to find out the basics before installing all the parts! (I've just using utility stuff like Alarm clock etc) Yeah, I also red that list aaaand can't wait for the update! Actually I didn't had that much problem with wobbly rockets, but having problem with snapping rocket during manoeuvre turns. Thanks for the advice!

But what about probes?

Not I'm the one who didn't do the homework From the not to suggest thread: " ** this means no general 'more parts' threads. If you have specific ideas feel free to post them. " And I been really specific.

if they add, I bet they will add an option to turn off too

Hello Dev Team! I would ask for two additional parts! #1: same as FL-R1 RCS Fuel Tank, but half as high, and also with half of propellent! Maybe with the "strongest" connection points. Why do I asking for this? - Because usually I don't need that much, and don't like to break my rockets aerodynamic shape with the smaller diameter one, or the radial-mounted tanks. - Also, no mono-propellent tank with the strongest connection point! #2: Advanced S.A.S Module, Large, with the "strongest" connection points. Why do I asking for this? - When I wish to make a more stable rocket, I would add more SAS module, but the medium sized connection point makes all those configurations very weak! Thanks in advance

I like this idea!

What about our current time? No big wars, no big conflicts, no ban on rocket designing (in the EU and USA at least), lots of rich companies, still only a handful of private space programs... The difference between amateurs and professionals is the big deal of €$£! That's all I say. For Braun, the price to send Buzz and Niel to the Mün, was the same price as their weight in gold. How many great mind out there today, who might develop a good space-vehicle, but have no money? You will know about them when they became a member of the "big company" who grant them the necessary founds, became famous, and you can read their bio, ...and how they started as an "amateur".

They might started independent... and Goddard and Braun were awful great minds, but they needed tons of money for all the research, ...and who were happy to pay that? For Braun the German state/army was the first sponsor, then he became needed for the USA, so it's government became the new sponsor. Korolev? He also became very precious for the Soviet. Why? Same as for the others: "Package" delivery! Rockets were for weapons firstly... and currently mostly too. And so many private companies like how much? ?2~3? which are capable conduct actual orbital flight (and how many flights been conducted by them? ..not much). How many governments? RSA CNSA can only do spaceflights. NASA ESA ISRO, Iran and the Koreas can launch satellites.(and these had several thousand successful launch in +50 years) You can argue with me, but facts are stubborn 8)

Interesting, but civil companies couldn't "start" a space-program on their own from the beginning! Early rocket developing needed far more money than private companies could finance. You have to take that to account!