PB666

34 ▼

There are things worth worrying about and things not worth worrying about, its not like a flat earther is somehiw missing their calling as a theoretical physicist.

Ah, but when you publish its good to know the nationality of your publishing house.

John boats go to about 24 feet by 8 feet You dont really care how much energy it produces ones twr > 1, the boat is minimal compared to the cost of the rocket.

Nope, still excluded. Just take the rocket 200 miles off shore, carry behind your boat an aluminum john boat. Put some out riggers on it tonstabikize it,ma long rope and wait for a calm day. The best way to get up now is to use a gps guidance computer. But for really small rockets, make a deal to launch it from a high south american plateau, it will make all the difference in the world as to hiw far down wind the rocket gets.,Try for a plateau around 12000 feet.

I heard a rumor that there were rumors.

7/10 like the simplicity and contrast.

Banned for excessive use of emojis.

http://www.sciencenewsline.com/news/2016062818520088.html

Not all planes are seaplanes. Why do we want to fly if we are not birds?

Banned because who really cares.

JAF123 check your bulkheads.

5/10 New hair brush?

Granted, I wish you had friends, too, unfortunately all my wishes are answered by poisonous parasitic ants.

As I catch her I Lobby for more NASA, NSF and NIH spending. Throw something non-political, with no mention of ________ (rhymes with bedtool) at the next poster, don't worry its not a bomb (tick, tick, tick).

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0628/Did-ancient-Earth-have-more-than-two-magnetic-poles

Road closed

. . his demise. However, . . .

Banned for pointing that out to me.

A bar hits you on the head, after you are unconscious ants crawl into the bar and steal all the candy. You wake up. I wish we all knew better than to wish by now.

THe way to do this is to have a confining RF beam that keeps the gas isolated. There is a thing called cold plasma, but its not as damaging as one might want. The first step in the process is to agitate the gas to get it to loose one of its outershell electrons, this generally can be done with vacuum UV, next step up the frequency progressively to remove lower electrons. This can be done with UV/Xrays. Finally to put pressure on the nucleus this can be done with Xrays (this gives the final bit of force required for a hydrogen-bomb). This gets the gas to move quite rapidly and in the confined space created by RF it will move in the direction of the momentum imparted by the Xrays. I have to say, the xrays over great distance will probably be more damaging to the target than the plasma. In fact why waste your time, photon weapons achieve the same result, if you know the surface composition of the target, just pound the target with different wavelengths at its excitations frequencies, and dumb in a few X-rays, that has the effect of generating basically alpha and beta particles, but at much higher doses than a typical laboratory.

Parts of this are relevant to the thread, concerning when the first life supporting galaxies appeared.

Because you [did not] request the collision sufficient politeness. What thought do you think was in the mind of the person when he named your galaxy the milky way?

Banned for not appreciating animations when you have an animation yourself.

Light does not age