PB666

Banned for overthinking!

█ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ ( - ) █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ -19 █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

█ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ ( - ) █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ -17 █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36786915 There you have it 2021, a Russian firecracker with a Euro drill on it.

99 cents

Banned for corrupting the scenary mesh.

█ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ ( - ) █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ -15 █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

But sea levels were lower, which means atmospheric pressure was lower for any given current spot. Other things that would have made it harder to breath, the screeching cold wind that blew out of the Artic across western Europe that could have frozen the lungs off of a wooly mammoth. That would have made breathing harder. Jet stream upon the northern ice sheets that tend to be far faster and cause specific high velocity inversions of very cold dry air. Because CO2 levels were lower plants that lived in regions with shorter growing seasons would have found it harder to accumulate biomass, and there would have been less biomass for humans. There was an estimate that the population stand for Neandertals that lived from Iberia to Siberia had an effective population size of 7000 individuals. through most of the period from 100000 until shortly before they went extinct. Another fact people did not know, before the end of the Younger Dryas there was cultivation, rye had either been domesticated or cultivated habitually in some areas. But rye was adaptive to poor climate, it was not until the Younger Dryas ended that you see the emergence of Emmer's wheat and domestication of cattle, both within 1500 years. This was followed within another 1500 years by the domestication of Hexaploid wheat. Development of much more productive seed crops did not just happen in a few places but everywhere. So as you are riding your bike though a field of grain, just remember that high O2:low CO2 makes it easier to breath but high CO2 and warm moist air, to a degree, makes it easier to eat.

And for the mother Barbarella's ship.

Banned for waiting.

No it wasn't, the topic was whether a vacuous statement sucks or simply counts as having no meaning. I say 'closing the thread'doesn't suck, but not claiming to close the thread while saying nothing only sucks because there is nothing there that would otherwise not suck. I clicked on this thread officially to clarify that, [ahem][straightens tie]

Reverted, no edits, cheater. I wish no on would click this thread

Banned because ~~~ I am the antimeme ~~~~

█ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ ( - ) █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ -15 █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

█ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ ( - ) █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ -15 █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

Tasty pasties

Banned because there is no meme in the profile picture.

That's not fair, reporters are intelligent. The problem is that if you study 20 diverse subjects a day, you will lack a focused or in depth knowledge in any group. Lets tke an example here. Suppose you farm all science and spacecraft and post here. That limited subject area is actually huge, you could not intelligibly handle it. So you filter, for example i left the video about human evolution on the feed, 5 seconds of play, thats enough,mits garbage, alt-backspace escape. You have to filter the topic area if you want to sound intelligent about the topics you do report on. One of the science reporters for Science magazine i interacted with in a forum, i learned that reporters often go to confetance to get a feel on the mood of a proffesion. But the problem is that conferances are often filled with unpublished information, and in some of the popular feilds its where the bigshots go to speculate (or are asked to spevulate by reporters). So these often miss the direction of the feild. We had a thing one time, we were contacted by a reporter after a conferance about what a speaker said, as i was one of the 'organizers' I watched all of the conferances at least in part, and this particular speakers topic was interesting but not paricularly relevant or important. They were waiting for us to publish the meeting abstracts and transcripts, which seemed odd.. What happened is that someone had reported the conferancee for fraud, but because he had not published he had no story, so the reporter (foriegn) had to try to get us to publish so that the reporter could have a story. I kind of scratched my head, because conferances are places of ideas not particularly fountains of professed knowledge. When you read a Science writer article on a human evolution you would be convinced that this is the state of knowledge, at best it general represents no more that half, the popular one, of the feild. At best you might have some snaps of slides, but lacking all the interesting details.

Well lets do at least a little bit of analysis. 1. Concorde design is 50 to 60 years old, it could be, should have been i improved upon. 2. I think when someone says 'based upon fusion power' and they are not talking about a nuclear bomb, then we just nod the head and smile. Again when they argue the technology is 7-13 years off, just nod your head and smile, there will not be a productive reactor in their lifetime and not a chance it could be factored to fit in a commercial airframe so its just a dream, let them. 3. The beeb, which is my primary news source, but not for science, does a reasonably decent job compared to say all of the major American news organizations. They tend to go a bit overboard on the limey stuff and all that on about lorries, peake and bloodhounds. We cant exactly ask the British brodc. C. not to be Brittas. Buts lets imagine if all our science news came from Fox news, including news about climate change, evolution all that stuff?

Banned because what seems legit.

It only sucks if thete is an argument that wants to flow into it. Nature abhores a vacuum except the overwhelming majority of the time when the vacuum is created by space.

Appending this to the previous @Dman979 This is the best place to follow the chain, within 3 or four post you will see the game is running by some new rule sets.

You already did at His post followed his own at -8, which is invalid. The are other errors after that @RainDreamer

Its kind of a vacuous point to me.

Banned just cause you feel like it.