Dman979

Well dressed, and a surplus of chain. Not the ~35 I can extrapolate from your photo.

Nope. Been using it since... 23rd April, 2015, 09:55 TUBM is a WWII buff

You call that a whip? This is a whip! And it's not even a Starwhip!

That's not a construction vehicle. This is a construction vehicle!

No, thank god! TUBM should go to bed.

Long Tom Arty. Dig a deep deep deep hole and crawl into it with shame.

P-47. You lose

Let me guess: when you leave the ship, yellow text says "No Pilots aboard and no SAS modules" You can't stop that. However, you can warp time for a bit to stop the rotation once you are off the ladder. And then do whatever you need to.

4x4? See you and raise you. 8x8.

Well, I had them for lunch, but I'm not eating them now. Digesting, yes. Eating, no. TUBM had caffeine within 5 hours before this post.

Heh heh, Rapid Unplanned Asteroid Disassembly. Very kerbal. I like.

Well, that's why you have the exit to main menu button and can restart. Or use f5/f9.

Hmmm. The EVA packs?

Wow, somebody sneaked in right under the wire!

I think it's just being weird. My workaround would be to add fuel lines from each tank stack to every other tank stack, so 6. If that doesn't work, try rebuilding it. If that doesn't work, IDK.

You could completely ignore aerodynamics and put it in a .90-style fairing! With wings and things! No tubes for you!

well, obviously, because I am myself. Cogito ergo sum, and all that. Or, as I like to say, " Cogito ergo sum ​​ego cogito" TUBM needs sleep.

Very nice build! I sense one problem, though- no boxes. How will you fix? I suggest more cowbell/boxes.

I vote for the MSL. Kill the cat! bonus points if you get the reference

You were in the Pacific Northwest. But I digress. Welcome!

No, I prefer doo-wap. TUBM is staying up late.

Well, that's kinda vauge. Yes-ish? TUBM likes clarity.

No sir! In fact, we are not allowed to play at all. We are here to observe the game, explain the rules, and clarify any issues that may arise in an impartial manner. The only time we are allowed to actively participate is in the case of a majorly flawed win, or some other similarly disastrous case. Also, I think that any other questions like this should be moved to a PM. It can be distracting from the game, even if it is meant humorously.

Here! Endersmens!

Yes, Endersmens is correct, but doesn't need to be so snippy . Fel, your post (the one I'm quoting) is correct. FireFaced, if you have any questions about the rules, feel free to ask any of us three. I only learned of the opportunity yesterday, those other comments I was making were simply taunts because I knew I would revert. But I was taking a self-imposed Deutherius-style break and stock-piling reverts. I used the furthest back one I could find; thus, my last great revert.