Dman979

+rep! Next job- make an F-86!

Can you delete the thread "I know this is in the wrong sub-forum" in General KSP? It has achieved its purpose.

You've got plenty of hardware there for KSP. I'm playing on a Mac with a 2.3GHz Intel i5 and 4GB of RAM. If I recall correctly, KSP only runs on one or two cores and cannot make use of all 4. Also, I'm not an expert on computers, so I'll send someone over who is. As to the progress- it's generally a sandbox game, so you can make as much or as little progress as you want. You first few tries might get you nowhere, but you can always come back to the forums for help. If you get bored, I find that it's helpful to take a break and come back refreshed. You can also try career mode, with procedurally generated goals- imagine a sandbox with tasks to complete.

I tried the demo in October-ish 13. Bought the game a few days later. That was back in .23, I think?

Barkeep, make it a double!

I don't think this goes here...

You got the emphasis wrong: that 2 is really a pair of 1's

and your 1 is really a 2 in disguise!

go team 1(hundred)!

Good hot pots! What do you know about Vanutau?

They're pretty landlocked. What do you know about Micronesia?

No problem! Ok. The cockpit looks perfect- can't get much better than that! As a bonus, you get a pilot and a WSO! The nosecone should be angled downwards. The intakes should be moved forwards. Personal preference- I'd offset the gears a bit into the fuselage. Vertical stabilizers are to the outside of the engines, not the center. The wings are the hardest part here: I would use at least 3 parts for the wings, they are broken up into 3 shapes. Here is a helpful (simplified) link to the wing shape, and this is the full drawing.

Wonderful! Are there any vids?

Sal- Hate to say it, but the OP said countries.

Well, I null that post. 1.

Actually, it was a null post b/c of ambiguity. But it went to zero anyway. so I make it 1.

So say it has CFTs!

A vowel-based game? What do you mean? TUBM is good at math.

Ah, Carp! My post could be interpreted in two ways! NOOO! -1!

Nice job! Could use some aesthetic tweaks, but I like it. +Rep! Comments: Cockpit- try using the Mk 1-2 cockpit in tandem: one facing forwards, one facing back. It'll also allow you to make a slightly better nosecone. Intakes- The top of the intakes is about even with the middle of the cockpit. Wings- Missing the curve at the back, but it's really really hard to do. Also, there are strakes between the intakes and the main wing. Engines- Should be a little closer together. In the drawings I've seen they are slightly angled towards each other. The above criticism was meant to be constructive and was in no was in no way a comment upon your plane-building skills. Sorry in advance if I was too blunt.

You're lucky- you don't have to relearn all the things you learned in <.90. Welcome!

Well, let's see: I've got the SAT's on Sunday, a paper due on Friday, and a study hall now. What do you think? TUBM learned CPR voluntarily (as opposed to learning it for a job).

It's big. It's bearly got a national symbol. It's cold. It's big. WDYK about America?

0 or number -1.

10^e^∞/10 Well, gosh and golly jeeze!